On YouTube:
Published on Apr 27, 2016 by Political Islam
Bill Maher is a self-declared liberal who has the courage and sense to condemn Islam’s brutality against women. And Mr. Maher gets the same response from liberals that I get. He is called a bigot. But, look at what Islam does to liberal principles. I used Wikipedia to get this list:
Freedom of speech: Sharia does not allow anybody to say anything negative about Mohammed and Allah.
Freedom of press: Mohammed cartoons.
Freedom of religion: An apostate from Islam can be killed. Even an atheist wants people to be free to choose what they believe.
Civil rights: all non-Muslims are Kafirs, who are third class subjects under Sharia law.
Democratic society: A Kafir does not have the same rights as a Muslim under Islam.
Secular governments: Secular is not Sharia. Islamic government is a theocracy.
Why do liberals and progressives defend an Islam that will destroy all they find so valuable?
{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }
Acceptance partakes so often stood a unruly factor in anthropological people that many those misery of set religion. But it is often faults of or a rejection to learn added about other beliefs fear of pollution? That leads to spiritual wars. This is explicitly correct in the occasion of Islam. please visit to Beautiful Islamic Quotes
Liberals invariably always defend muslim crime because they are the same: criminals!
Like all criminals, leftists are defeatist masochists at heart, having no faith in being able to trust anyone else, and so in stead choosing to slander everyone else as being untrustworthy.
Having no hope of “winning,” they instead work feverishly to make sure everyone else loses, too!
Like Muhammad, their defeatism leads to self-fulfilling prophecies, where they attack everyone else, first, then blame their victims for having “made” them attack. Their alibis to excuse their criminal choices are that there is no free will and there were no choices to be made; they pretend to be victims at the mercy of inevitable, “predetermined/predestined” force: victims of society/mere products of their environments, and of course slaves of “allah.”
Masochists pretend to “control” their fears (in stead of trying to learn to recognize and fix mistakes and solve problems by paying attention to their fears) BY causing the same, worst-case scenario, pain-causing problems they fear the most.
(Hence libertine “liberalism,” where they pretend that it’s noble to pretend that fear doesn’t exist, and so always want to “progress” to “freedom” from the fearful pain of self-restraint).
In this way, they hope to avoid the fear of pain, by pre-emptively inflicting that pain on themselves (thus cancelling the auxiliary pain caused by the fear)! See?
But while not ALL criminal negligence is masochism, all masochism IS criminal negligence.
And of course, such criminals are also always all about the subjective double-standards:
What they advocate for in public may be only an attempt to sway everyone ELSE to SUBMIT!
Being selfish, they embrace hypocritical double standards, wanting rights without responsibilities, to never be offended by having their feelings hurt by the painful truth of being accused of their crimes.
And others are expected to have only responsibilities to them – to embrace suicidal masochism as their highest virtue – “TO GO ALONG” (with their criminal lies) “TO GET ALONG” (with the lying criminals)!
“Be a sport! Gimme a pass! We’re all only victims, right?”
In that way alone, (as victim) the Devil pretends he doesn’t exist.
😉
Criminals, who can’t support their “Crime is good! Trust me!” rhetoric with facts, must substitute feelings!
So islam itself really only says:
“Crime is good (but only for me, Muhammad, or on my behalf) and God says you should be my slave!”
Then it goes out of context and order, mixes everything up to confuse people into going along with it!
To backwards excuse-making idolaters, noticing anothers’ crimes and daring to complain about them is exactly the same thing, if not actually worse, than committing those same crimes yourself!
Liberals, being Marxists, see everything from an economic, not a religious, viewpoint.
That IS their “religion.” So to them muslims can’t be dangerous because of general religious doctrines which tell them to hate infidels because their god does, it must be because of specific economic grievances.
They ignore that islam was created by rich Muhammad to further enrich himself at everyone else’s expense, and is still perpetrated. And it’s based on Moe’s self-enriching and crime-excusing alibi that god wanted him to commit his crimes!
And yet, the Qur’an clearly and very specifically tells muslims the Bible is wrong and also that all Christians and Jews are infidel criminals who worship a false god, and who must therefore be extorted, enslaved, and murdered for their “crime” of not being muslims:
Sura (Chapter) 47:1-4 of the Qur’an:
1: non-muslims are bad, (allegedly because they insult allah by dividing his nature*);
2: muslims are good, (allegedly because to them allah is the cause of everything*);
3: Allah made them both like that;
4: So muslims should chop off the non-muslims’ heads.
(“Allah could have done it himself, but he wants you muslims to do it for him”).
…
It’s all right there, in context: islamic violence is entirely general doctrine-driven, and not at all specific grievance-driven.
(And chapter 47 isn’t by any stretch even remotely the worst, most violent chapter; that honor goes to either chapter 8 or 9).
So don’t go looking for what actions of yours may have offended or provoked them; they have been taught from birth that your existence alone offends their god, and so should offend them.
Muslims have been officiallly taught to believe that they are the “best of people” (Qur’an 3:110) and that unbelievers are the “most vile of created beings” (Qur’an 98:6).
——-
*[Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority: their abode will be the Fire: And evil is the home of the wrong-doers! (3:151)].
=======
Marxists always insist on very SPECIFIC economic reasons for “victims” to go ballistic and rise up in revolt against their oppressors.
Marx’s main alibi to excuse his followers’ criminal desires and extortionist actions was, of course, only another variant of the “inevitable” predestination one, which he called “Historical Predeterminism.”
It means that there is never any free will choice, because humans are robots and helpless victims of forces beyond their control: they are victims of society, mere products of their environments, and, as their muslim brethren say, “slaves of allah!”
So to Marxists there is no way anyone can choose to become a jihadi because they thought it was a good idea based on reading where the Qur’an says god himself sanctions their holy crimes – because, like Muhammad himself, Marxists pretend to believe that there are no real crimes nor criminals (since criminality requires a mens-rea guilty mind/criminal intent) because we’re all really ever only helpless victims.
Ignoring humans’ capacity for free will choices means they can always fail upwards as they endlessly try to explain what is most easily and accurately explained by their CHOICES – so since it’s unsolvable, they pretend we need them to be our expert salesmen to investigate all the mysterious causes of the endless symptoms of their choice to not solve the problem, as they spin simple, easily solved problems with simple, permanent solutions into eternal crises with only temporary band-aid therapies available – in other words, since their motto is “THERE’S NO MONEY IN SOLUTIONS!” we must always “PLEASE GIVE GENEROUSLY – AGAIN!”
To criminals, the only crime is accusing people of committing crimes &/or of choosing to be criminals!