#Caturday: The Cruelest Cut: How Cat Declawing Became the Next Battleground for Animal Rights

by 1389 on September 14, 2013

in 1389 (blog admin), Caturday

Houston Press has the story:

Over the years Jennifer Conrad has come to see her fight as one against greed and stupidity, a nasty pocket of the stuff festering deep in the heart of her own profession. When her crusade began, though, Conrad wasn’t thinking that way. She was focused on one patient, Drifter, a three-year-old, 550-pound tiger who was in agony and pissed off about it.

Growing up in a family of physicians in Malibu, Conrad was always passionate about animal welfare. She’d gone to veterinary school with the idea of helping endangered species and had traveled to six continents, working with exotic animals and often trading her services for room and board. Around Hollywood, where she was known as “the Vet to the Real Stars,” her patients included many famous film performers, including the tiger featured in The Hangover.

But Conrad treated less-celebrated felines, too — big cats that had worked in circuses or in Vegas-style magic acts until they became too old or sick and were farmed out to carnivore sanctuaries. Many of them had been declawed in their youth in an effort to make them easier to handle on stage. The surgical procedure, known as an onychectomy, involves amputation of the final segment of toe bone as well as the attached claw and can have numerous long-term complications, including chronic pain, bleeding, lameness, arthritis, aggressiveness and nail regrowth.

Several of the tigers and lions Conrad saw had been practically crippled by the anatomical changes wrought by the surgery. Some walked on their wrists or elbows or hardly moved at all because putting weight on their toes was too painful. One of the worst was Drifter, a Siberian mix with a pronounced limp. He was so debilitated that Conrad decided to organize a surgical team to reattach tendons in Drifter’s paws that had been severed by the declawing.

In the course of the innovative five-hour operation, the team also removed hefty nuggets of nail fragments, several centimeters in length, that had been growing under the skin, causing pain and distorting Drifter’s gait. The results were dramatic.

“After surgery he was standing up like a normal cat and walking like a normal cat,” Conrad recalls. “He never fell back down onto his wrists. Then we knew we were on to something.”

Beginning with Drifter’s operation in 1999, Conrad began documenting on film her efforts to rehabilitate declawed exotics. She paid for the first eight surgeries out of her own pocket. She figured that the “before” images might help persuade authorities to ban the declawing of wild animals and that the “after” pictures could prompt their handlers to seek relief for those already afflicted. She was right on both counts. In 2004, thanks largely to her efforts, California banned the declawing of wild cats; two years later, the U.S. Department of Agriculture enacted a nationwide ban on declawing for virtually all large carnivores.

Conrad has now performed around 225 tendon-repair surgeries on 76 lions, tigers, panthers and other declawed exotics. But her film project has morphed into something else: an emotional, provocative yet scientifically grounded documentary, The Paw Project, about her decade-long battle to stop the declawing of the common American house cat.

Most pet-friendly nations already outlaw onychectomy. The United Kingdom’s Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons deems the procedure “not acceptable” under most circumstances, and laws in most European countries explicitly prohibit it. In Israel, declawing a cat can result in a fine of 75,000 shekels — more than $20,000. Authorities in Brazil, Japan, Turkey and Australia also frown on the practice.

Yet in the United States, declawing is still a common — and lucrative — part of the veterinary business. A surgery that’s now considered too barbaric for wild animals is widely marketed through coupons and special spay-neuter “package deals” to cat lovers of all stripes. Studies indicate that 22 million cats, about one-fourth of the country’s total domesticated feline population, have been declawed. On average, vets charge between $400 and $800 for the surgery, which takes less than ten minutes per paw and can be done with a scalpel, laser or guillotine-type trimmer.

In more than 90 percent of the cases, pet owners request the surgery on a cat’s front paws (and sometimes all four) because of concerns about Fluffy scratching the furniture. Veterinarians justify the procedure by describing it as an effective solution to a behavior problem that might otherwise lead to the animal being abandoned or surrendered to a shelter. But Conrad and other critics of declawing say it’s the vet industry’s dirty, bloody, money-making secret, an excruciating and unnecessary procedure that’s fraught with complications and mutilates cats. In many cases, they say, declawing leads to even more problematic behavior — including biting and a refusal to use the litter box — that dooms cats to shelters and euthanization.

A spot check of eight vet clinics around the Houston area last week showed all of them willing to perform the surgery, although a few said they will do only the two front paws. One clinic’s receptionist explained that if all four are done, “They can’t go outside.” The operation is not inexpensive here; prices quoted ranged from $150 for just the two front claws to $1,000 for all four. Some vet offices promised no pain at all; at others, the receptionists readily stated that the kitten or cat would be in some pain and experience some swelling after the procedure, even with pain medications. At only one place did the person on the phone recommend that we try covering the cat’s claws with Soft Paws, sold at PetSmart or Petco, before jumping into the surgery.

“If declawing helped the cat in any way, I would not be fighting like this,” Conrad says. “Declawing does not keep a cat in its home. If someone is intolerant of a cat scratching a couch, they’re really going to be intolerant of a cat not using the litter box.”

Conrad has a letter from one veterinarian in Southern California who bragged that “he declaws every cat that comes in the door because it makes him between $75,000 and $80,000 a year,” she says. “The bottom line is that veterinarians make a lot of money doing this, and they recommend it without disclosing what the surgery does to cats.”

The Paw Project tracks Conrad’s quest to persuade officials in nine California cities, from West Hollywood to San Francisco, to support a municipal ban on declawing. The film is scheduled for a special screening in Denver days before a New York premiere and national theatrical release later this month.

In Colorado, vets and cat-rescue people hope to use the screening as the kickoff for an even more ambitious campaign, a push to pass legislation next year that would create a ban on declawing across Colorado — the first statewide ban anywhere in the country.

“We want to ban it because it is fundamentally cruel,” says retired vet Jean Hofve, co-author of The Complete Guide to Holistic Cat Care. “It’s a radical surgery to correct a behavior problem that’s not hard to fix by other means. No other civilized country does it except Canada, and even Canada is getting close to banning it.”

Perhaps because declawing has become a deeply divisive issue among practitioners, the American Veterinary Medical Association and many state vet organizations have tried to sound studiously neutral on the subject. The AVMA policy on declawing acknowledges that the surgery “is not a medically necessary procedure for the cat in most cases” and urges that it be considered only if less drastic alternatives to correct behavior problems fail — and only after owners are provided “complete education with regard to feline onychectomy.”

But in Texas, Katie Jarl, director of the state chapter of the Humane Society of the United States, couldn’t be any clearer: “If this practice was being performed on a human, it would be like cutting off each finger at the last knuckle.

She adds, “It’s an extremely painful procedure” that can lead to other behavior problems. Like, say, a cat’s foregoing the litter box because the litter irritates its freshly amputated nubs.

“Also, cats have claws for a reason…They use [them] oftentimes as a defense mechanism, especially those cats that are outdoor cats,” Jarl says. “And when they don’t have that first defense, they will oftentimes go straight to biting.”

Thirty years ago, when a new partner in his veterinary practice began declawing cats, Aubrey Lavizzo didn’t consider the procedure all that remarkable. The partner had learned the technique at Colorado State University; Lavizzo, who’d studied at Tuskegee University in the 1960s, when declawing was a lot less common, soon picked up the basics and began doing a few himself.

The partnership ended after several years. Lavizzo continued to declaw when pet owners asked for it, albeit with growing qualms. “We didn’t have good anesthetics,” he recalls. “Bleeding and post-operative pain were huge issues. We thought we were doing some good; we talked about how, if we didn’t do it, these cats would lose their homes. But I started seeing more and more problems.”

He saw post-op abscesses and cats gnawing their own paws. He saw blood-sprayed cages when the bandages weren’t tight enough and sloughed-off flesh when they were too tight. Worst of all, he saw cats in severe pain days or weeks after the surgery. He began to doubt the wisdom of performing amputations to correct what was, after all, normal feline behavior — especially when there were less gruesome alternatives, from scratching posts to nail caps to weekly trims, available to even the laziest pet owner. After one particularly upsetting case, he decided he would never do another one.

“I finally just asked myself, ‘Why am I hurting cats?'” he remembers. “There’s no moral way to justify it. It’s a violation of the oath we took.”

Lavizzo stopped doing declaws in the 1990s, becoming one of the first vets in Colorado to denounce the procedure. “I had some good clients who begged me to do it, and I told them I couldn’t, and I wouldn’t refer them to anyone else,” he says. “There’s no right way to do an unnecessary surgery and somehow guarantee that there won’t be complications.”

Far from hurting his practice, Lavizzo’s stance brought in new customers who were pleased that he didn’t offer declawing. (Point of disclosure: Although I’m petless at present and was unaware of his declawing policy until recently, cats and dogs in my household were treated by Lavizzo for years.) He believes his position also attracted a stronger pool of job applicants, including assistants and technicians who prefer to work in a place that doesn’t declaw. In 2011, the Colorado Veterinary Medical Association named him Veterinarian of the Year. He’s now the state director of Conrad’s nonprofit, the Paw Project, and leading the campaign to ban declawing in Colorado.

In surveys, pet owners tend to express a high degree of satisfaction with the immediate results of declawing. Lavizzo acknowledges that some cats seem to recover from the surgery comparatively well — at least in the short term. But he has also seen a mounting pile of distressing posts on veterinarian discussion boards about declawing problems: practitioners seeking guidance when confronted with a wide array of complications, reports of nail regrowth occurring years after the surgery, confusion and conflicting advice about the best way to perform the operation and manage the pain, and so on.

“Some cats do fine,” he says. “But who has the right to decide it’s okay for some but not others? We don’t know which cats will have complications. To me, one is too much.”

When Conrad began looking into the scientific literature on the impacts of declawing, she found it to be surprisingly thin. There was hardly anything in the way of a long-range study tracking the welfare of declawed cats. “On a procedure that’s done on 25 percent or more of American cats, there are fewer than 30 articles about the surgery,” she says. “I later came to think that people don’t want to know the truth about it.”

Proponents of declawing claim that what research has been done supports the practice — and they cite the supposed absence of studies reporting negative effects as another point in their favor. For example, the AVMA policy on declawing states, rather cagily, that “there is no scientific evidence that declawing leads to behavioral abnormalities when the behavior of declawed cats is compared with that of cats in control groups.”

Hofve, the holistic vet who’s working with Lavizzo on a Colorado ban, views that statement as misleading on several levels. A short-term comparison with a control group is a lot less useful, she argues, than a detailed, long-range analysis of an individual cat’s behavior before and after surgery. And one 2001 peer-reviewed study, the only one involving a five-year follow-up period, found that 33 percent of the cats in the study group developed serious behavior problems after being declawed. Another study found that “inappropriate elimination” is twice as likely in declawed cats as in those that hadn’t had the surgery; apparently, using the litter box can further irritate sore paws. (Biting, a separate but often related behavior problem, tends to increase in declawed cats because of the loss of their primary means of defense.)

“There’s plenty of data,” Hofve insists. “But the vet associations don’t want anyone telling them what to do. Who’s going to fund a long-term study of something they don’t want to find out?”

Hofve points to other studies and surveys that challenge the American veterinary establishment’s position on declawing. The AVMA policy indicates that the surgery should only be considered as a kind of last resort, but the available research suggests that 70 percent or more of declawings are done before the cat is a year old — hardly a sign that the owners have exhausted all other approaches to the scratching problem. (Promotional videos used in Conrad’s documentary capture vets urging clients to have the procedure done on kittens.) And surveys reveal that the vast majority of pet owners who are considering declawing will change their minds when given facts about the nature of the surgery, the potential complications and non-surgical alternatives.

Those results, Hofve says, indicate her colleagues are doing a piss-poor job of educating their clients about basic expectations and obligations involved in having a cat as a pet. “Veterinarians aren’t telling people that when you get a cat, you’re supposed to get a scratching post,” she says. “As of 2012, 48 percent of cat owners still didn’t know that. We’ve also failed to educate people about what declawing really is.”

During her first five years in practice, Hofve did her share of declaws. Then, like Lavizzo, she stopped. “I was never any good at it because I hated it so much,” she says.

Even after she gave up performing the procedure, she continued to see cats that had been declawed elsewhere and were suffering complications — in some cases, many years after the surgery. She saw a ten-year-old cat that had been declawed as a kitten and was experiencing painful nail regrowth from bone fragments that had been left behind, similar to the nuggets removed from under Drifter’s skin in Conrad’s surgery. If one in three cats that are declawed are manifesting obvious behavior problems, such as biting and pooping outside the box, Hofve believes the percentage of those experiencing complications of one kind or another is much, much higher; we just don’t know about them because of the highly stoic nature of the species. No one knows, for example, to what extent cats may experience the kind of “phantom limb” pain associated with human amputations.

There’s a good reason, Lavizzo adds, that nobody is declawing dogs: “When we see pain in dogs, we react to it. Cats are different; they don’t show pain like dogs do. They go off and hide, and we just think they’re being independent. We don’t have the same kind of reaction to a cat’s pain because we don’t really know what’s going on with the cat.”

Colorado Springs veterinarian James Gaynor, a specialist in pain management, has done extensive research on the chronic pain symptoms exhibited by some declawed cats. He says that veterinarians need to make sure owners understand that declawing isn’t simply nail trimming, but a “ten-toe amputation.”

“It’s a simple but major orthopedic procedure,” he says. “I am not against declawing whatsoever. I believe that if the anesthesia and pain management are handled correctly, it’s no different from any other surgery that we perform.”

Gaynor advocates an aggressive treatment approach, involving numerous drugs administered over several days, to greatly reduce the risk that a cat will experience chronic pain from the surgery. With the development of more cat-specific painkillers, he believes that most vets are doing a better job of post-operative care — though some still balk at the additional time and expense involved in the protocol he advocates. He recalls visiting a “big practice” back East where the vets “did almost nothing for pain management. They were basically torturing the cat. This shouldn’t be some cut-rate procedure.”

Although declawing is becoming an increasingly contentious issue among vets, basic instruction in the surgery is still taught at all but two of the country’s 28 veterinary schools. Tim Hackett, a professor at Colorado State University and interim director of CSU’s veterinary teaching hospital, says the university offers the “least traumatic” surgical methods. “We respect that people have ethical concerns about this,” he says, “but it’s a procedure that is somewhat in demand, and a practitioner should be exposed to the proper surgical technique and medications. I’d hate to have them learning it on the fly.”

At Texas A&M’s veterinary school, students are taught how to declaw cats through practice on cadavers, and in their fourth year, they are given opportunities to declaw client pets. Dr. Mark Stickney, director of general surgery services at Texas A&M, says that it’s important for students to learn the proper procedures, the correct ways to perform them and the issues that surround them so they can decide if declawing is a procedure they will perform.

When asked if any students decline to practice declawing cats, Stickney says, “We have had a couple of students, and they are in the minority. They are absolutely fine about knowing the procedure and how it exists, but not actually performing it.”

According to Stickney, Texas A&M students perform about 25 declawing procedures each year, depending on the number of client pets brought into the veterinary school.

Randa MacMillan, the current president of the Colorado Veterinary Medical Association, stopped offering declawing in her own practice many years ago. But she suspects that the procedure is still “moderately common” among her membership and that the campaign to ban it will be a contentious one. She notes that an attempt last year to enact a ban on docking the tails of dairy cows — a surgery that makes things easier for the dairy industry but robs the animal of its only way to ward off flies — failed miserably.

“It’s very hard to tell another vet how to practice,” MacMillan says. “There are people who still routinely declaw, and these are the same ones who will really scream if somebody tries to tell them how to practice medicine.”

Vets who do offer feline onychectomy say the current procedure, if properly done, has little in common with the butchery of big cats depicted in Conrad’s film. Sara Mark, owner of the Southwest Veterinary Hospital in Littleton, attended a screening of The Paw Project at Lavizzo’s office a few weeks ago and left unpersuaded by the claims about long-term complications and behavior problems. “People involved in the rescues see the bad cases,” she says. “In 30 years of practice, I have had no cats that regrew portions of nail. I had one that ended up with some neuritis that we were able to remedy.”

Southwest recently came under fire on an anti-declawing Web site for offering free declaws as part of a clinical trial for pain medication. Mark says the clients who participated in the study weren’t encouraged by her team to declaw and were required to sign lengthy release forms disclosing the details of the surgery. She, too, stresses alternatives to declawing when clients ask about it: “If you don’t want property damage in your house, don’t have an animal,” she says. But she also believes the surgery is justified in certain cases; she’s had three immune-compromised clients seeking organ transplants who were told they’d be taken off the transplant list if they didn’t have their cats declawed. And there’s the prospect of a sofa-shredding cat losing its home.

“If it comes down to yet another cat that’s going to live its life in a shelter or get euthanized,” Mark says, “or doing a front declaw to let that cat live — I cannot in good conscience say yes, being dead is better than losing your claws.”

But declawed cats end up in shelters, too. They may be more likely to end up there in later years, as arthritis and elimination problems surface, than cats that still have their claws. One study found that declawed cats are nearly twice as likely to be surrendered to shelters as their intact brethren. Since cats with behavior problems are much less likely to be deemed adoptable, their euthanization rate may be higher, too.

Yet the percentage of declawed cats found among shelter populations seems to vary widely. Scott of the Cat Care Society reports that her shelter currently has 60 cats awaiting adoption. Ten are declawed cats. Most of them were returned eight years or more after they were first adopted. Six of them were returned specifically because of failure to use the litter box.

Not all declawed cats have “inappropriate elimination” issues, of course. Hofve suggests that owners who insist on declawed pets can find suitable ones in shelters without maiming any more. And with better, less costly anti-scratching options widely available, from furniture covers to consults with animal behaviorists, Hofve doesn’t see any ethical rationale for the surgery.

“Maybe declawing does save some lives,” she says. “But for others, it’s a death sentence. It shouldn’t be a choice between declawing and getting rid of the cat in the first place. It’s a choice between declawing and many alternatives.”

“Addressing a behavior problem with surgery in human medicine went out with lobotomy,” she says. “This can be addressed with behavior modification, not surgery.”

At Special Pals Animal Adoption Center in Katy, Texas, Acting Executive Director Elizabeth Trick says her shelter is also against declawing.

“I personally consider it a little inhumane,” Trick says. She suggests alternatives, such as a repellent called Boundary, which is sprayed around That Which Shall Not Be Scratched, or the old-fashioned water spray-bottle method.

The Humane Society’s Jarl talks about investing some time with your pet. Kittens can easily be taught to go straight to a scratching post, as can adult cats (although a dollop of catnip might be necessary to sweeten the offer at first). Or how about this for a radical idea: Just get your cat’s nails trimmed.

If your cat absolutely cannot tolerate a nail trimming, Jarl points to alternatives like Soft Paws — vinyl claw caps — or a special tape called Sticky Paws that you apply directly to furniture or other items you don’t want your cat scratching. Eventually, the cat will become annoyed and give up. (The HSUS Web site also has a “Cat Answer Tool,” www.humanesociety.org/animals/cats/cat_problem_solver/, that provides more advice on how to deal with scratching.)

The only time HSUS believes declawing is justified is in rare medical cases, like cancerous nailbed tumors, Jarl says.

Sheri Sanders, an attorney and the head of Kitty City Feral Sanctuary, is also among those who are against the procedure. Although Kitty City deals largely with feral cats, Sanders says none of her own cats are declawed — domesticated felines need their claws as well.

“They come with claws for a reason,” she says, not to mention that “it’s unnecessary surgery, which is always a bad idea, because there’s a risk. You know, anesthesia is dangerous; you have the likelihood of infection, plus it hurts them. I mean, when you declaw a cat, they remove the last joint on the paw — the whole joint. The bone, the claw, everything, and then they wrap the ligaments around the remaining joint. Now, why would you subject your animal to that?

“If you want a pet, all the stuff that comes with a pet is going to come with the pet — you know, the claws, the occasional pooping, the occasional vomiting…I just don’t even understand why anyone would subject an animal they claim to love to that kind of thing.”

Sanders adds, “If you want a cat, you know, you have to provide for them what they need. And again, they’re predators in the wild; they haven’t lost all of those instincts yet…They have to be able to climb; you have to give them stuff to climb on. They use their claws to pick up toys and chase toys.

“If you take their claws away, you’ve basically relegated them to a position on the floor or the couch or the bed…I’m not saying that makes them miserable; it’s certainly better than having them in a pound or loose on the streets where they’re starving, but it doesn’t have to be an either-or. You know, many people declaw by choice.

“My attitude is: If you have to render an animal that helpless, you should get a stuffed animal.”

Craig Malisow and Molly Dunn contributed to this article.


More here.

{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }

1 Gramfan September 14, 2013 at 5:16 pm

I had never heard of cat declawing until I went to visit some friends in LA several years ago.

They had a Siamese cat who had been declawed.

I used to own and breed Siamese cats so when I was told this I was quite horrified.

The reason given was that the cat might climb up the drapes, ruin the furniture etc.

My cats and kittens did get up to mischief now and then – broke vases, pot plants and such, but I would never have deprived them of their claws.

I kept thinking: what if the poor cat was outside – they ventured out often – and being chased by a dog? Without its claws to get up the nearest tree the cat would have no escape.

I don’t own any more cats but I have never heard of this being done where I live.
I know of a couple of dogs that have been de-barked because of complaining neighbours, but that’s about it!

I no longer have pets. Too many rules and regulations make it a lot less pleasurable now. Not to mention vet costs!

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: