Espionage — part of the counterjihad effort

by Hesperado on May 18, 2012

in "moderate muslims", 1389 Blog, counterjihad, Hesperado (team member), Islam, Islamic infiltration/invasion, jihad, stealth jihad

spy v spy

by Hesperado


The “espionage” I refer to in the title is the infiltration of mosques “undercover” — by individuals, often Infidels pretending to be Muslims, who understand Arabic and/or Urdu languages — in order to find out the seamy underside of what really goes on in those mosques when the Muslim congregations and imams think no one is watching them.

Indeed, this “espionage” could be termed Stealth Counterjihad — recalling the “Spy vs. Spy” activities of the Cold War.

For, in more ways than one, we are engaged in a kind of “Cold War”, though a better term might be the “Phony War” that preceded World War 2 — since the only reason this has not become a “Hot War” is because the West persists in its maddeningly naive myopia by which it refuses to see that an intrinsic and necessary part — indeed the very heart — of the global revival of Islam in the 21st century is the war which Muslims are conducting against us.

I.e., it’s a Hot War for Muslims, but a Non-War for most of the West, blithely unaware in its PC MC idiocy, and often even going the extra idiotic mile of actively (though not purposefully) helping Muslims whitewash the menace they are pursuing against us.


At any rate, slowly but surely, the stillicide of the counterjihad continues to plug away (as it has to, given that our dominant mainstream society and its representatives, our public servants in politics, news and academe, continue to be remiss in their responsibility to defend our societies from the dangers of Islam) — and one form of it has been the espionage of the various “undercover mosque” activities conducted by various people.


Recently, for example, Jihad Watch published a report of an “undercover mosque” project in Sweden. The findings of the report? Six out of ten Islamic preachers were found to give illegal advice to Muslim questioners (or to questioners they thought were Muslims) asking questions about polygamy, wife-beating, and spousal rape — illegal, that is, in civilized Western countries like Sweden. Under Islamic sharia law, such crimes (and many others) are not crimes at all, but perfectly legitimate, stemming from either the Koran or the advice of Muhammad himself as supposedly documented in the Islamic hadiths.

This recalls other similar efforts in the last several years:


The most famous and most comprehensive one was conducted in several mosques in England in 2007 and broadcast on English telly, with a follow-up in 2008 (with excellent analysis by David Thompson at the time).

Czech Republic

Another was done in 2009 in one mosque in Prague, of the Czech Republic.


And another was conducted in 2003 in six mosques throughout Italy.


Yet another was this survey done beginning in 2007 by undercover infiltrators fluent in Arabic and Urdu who monitored 100 mosques throughout the U.S.A. — the Mapping Sharia project.


All of these various glimpses into what’s going on in mosques in various Western countries found that the majority of them are promoting, in one way or another, Islamic supremacism and its logical concomitants, intolerance, hatred, truculence and bellicosity against the Unbeliever and his ways and laws. They indicate that such extremism is not a fringe factor in Islam, but is mainstream, normative and endemic — if not pandemic.

{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }

1 American Delight May 19, 2012 at 9:06 am

Hey, Hesp!

Intelligence services and the NYPD are more realistic about the threat than politicians and news media.

Spain’s spy service has also written a report on the subject:

The Q Society has informed me that ASIO is using overt & covert methods to monitor Australian mosques…

2 1389 May 19, 2012 at 9:52 pm

@American Delight,

The NYPD knows that NYC is most likely to be Ground Zero for the next attempted major attack – and there will be more attempts. When the chips are down, it’s up to NYPD to connect all the dots in time to thwart those attacks, and the bulk of the responsibility is theirs.

I strongly recommend that every state and major city take the bulk of the responsibility for securing all of the major transportation, communication, and energy assets within their jurisdictions. That includes everything: nuke plants, power grids, seaports, airports, dams and reservoirs, water and sewer systems, subways, railroad stations and bridges, highways, Internet trunks, you name it. The federal government may be able to catch some of the perps and forestall some attacks, but when the rubber meets the road, we need more levels of security, and that’s where state and local authorities come in.

I live in an unincorporated area and I like it that way! After 9-11, I began to feel uncomfortable around densely populated areas. Even so, county sheriffs might want to consider training and deputizing law-abiding citizens to help secure the safety of the above assets!

3 Hesperado May 19, 2012 at 10:20 pm

Good points, American Delight and 1389.

As you may know, there was a federal amendment — introduced by a Democrat, naturally, Rush Holt of NJ — recently put up for vote that would have had the effect of crippling the NYPD’s ongoing ability to protect NYC by surveillance of Muslim mosques and other Muslim venues.

The U.S. House of Representatives vote tally on this is revealing (“Aye” means “go ahead and cripple the NYPD’s ability to defend NYC”, and “Nay” of course means “No, do NOT implement this amendment”):

________Aye Nay
Republican 16 224
Democratic 177 8

The irrationality of PC MC is evidently afflicting the hearts and minds of Democrats more than Republicans.

For more, see: “Left and Right in Black and White”

4 American Delight May 20, 2012 at 7:52 am

Those are scary vote totals.

You know that the intel program is effective and crucial to public safety when even pro-GZM dhimmi Mayor Bloomberg defends it.

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: