Triple Jeopardy for Lars Hedegaard

by 1389 on April 9, 2012

in 1389 (blog admin), censorship, Denmark, European Union, Islamic infiltration/invasion, Lars Hedegaard, PC MC, sex offenses, tyranny

Evidently, the Danish and EU authorities are comfortable with ongoing sexual abuse within their Muslim enclaves, but woe betide any non-Muslim journalist who dares to mention it!

Round Three in the Trial of Lars Hedegaard

An interview with the Danish free speech advocate, who again goes on trial for insulting Islam.

By Ann Snyder
Lars Hedegaard
In Denmark, sticks and stones may break your bones, but insulting words will get you fined — to the tune of 5,000 kroner (or about $1,000). Article 266(b) of the Danish penal code, one of the more sweeping of the “hate speech” provisions, criminalizes, among other things, merely insulting groups of people due to their membership in enumerated protected classes.

On April 13, 2012, Lars Hedegaard — a journalist, historian, and president of the Danish Free Press Society – takes the appeal of his conviction under Article 266(b) to the Danish Supreme Court. Readers may recall that back in January of 2011, Hedegaard was tried and acquitted for remarks he made during a 2009 interview concerning sexual abuse within Muslim communities. (In a related story, Danish MP Jesper Langballe “confessed,” pleading guilty to violating Article 266(b) for remarks he made in support of Hedegaard.) But, in a strange twist, Hedegaard’s acquittal was appealed. He was retried on April 26, 2011, and convicted on May 3.

Thrice put in jeopardy

When Hedegaard appealed his conviction to the Danish Supreme Court, the prosecutor cross-appealed, demanding an increase in the fine. In an interview with the Legal Project, Mr. Hedegaard provided some thoughts on the process:

You could say in our country — as opposed to yours — we have not double but triple jeopardy. If the prosecutor doesn’t have his way in lower court, he can appeal to Superior Court. And if he doesn’t get it there, he can appeal to the Supreme Court. So, you can certainly be dragged through a legal process lasting years and years in this country. That is the sad state of affairs.

And dragged through an endless process Hedegaard has been. The remarks on which his conviction rests were made over two years ago. Since then, he has endured two trials, and the appeal to the Supreme Court is number three. But the fact that Denmark’s high court has chosen to hear Hedegaard’s appeal is significant. As with the U.S. Supreme Court, review is at the discretion of the court.

Hedegaard remarked:

In my case it is questionable what can be overturned by the Supreme Court.  The very fact that they have even allowed my case to go in front of the Supreme Court is very strange and very rare. There is a special committee that grants you the right to appeal to the Supreme Court.  You cannot just do it.  You need a special commission to do that. The very fact that I have been given this right might indicate that the court has found some technical problems with my conviction.

Further, rumor has it that seven judges are set to participate, a suggestion that the court may consider its upcoming decision to be of precedential value.

Read the rest.

More at Gates of Vienna.

In case you doubt that Islam promotes sexual abuse…

…and if you have a strong stomach, see: Islamic Sexuality: A Survey of Evil

{ 0 comments… add one now }

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: