At first glance, Anthony Weiner’s use of the Internet as a vehicle for long-distance flashing might seem to be off-topic for a hard-news counterjihad blog. (No pun intended!) Other sources, such as Andrew Breitbart and Robert Stacy McCain, have already provided ample coverage, and yes, the jokes just keep on writing themselves.

But it turns out that there’s more to the story than that. Much more.

Politically incorrect comedienne Julia Gorin mines Weinergate for some new comedy gold:

Strauss-Kahn’s Weiner

June 08th 2011 10:41:56 PM – Posted by Julia Gorin

So it turns out that Anthony Weiner’s wife is a Muslim who works for Hillary Clinton. This explains a lot. He must have figured that if she likes Hillary so much, then — like Hillary — she wouldn’t mind if he showed his pee-pee to others.

Given that the man who married them was Bill Clinton, their fate was pretty much sealed right there.

Mr. and Mrs. Skeletor a/k/a Anthony Weiner and Huma Abedin
(Ever notice how people will often marry people who look exactly like them?)

Now, I haven’t been following this story or the one about the other prominent Jew and his Muslim. That would be IMF chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn and the devout West African Muslim hotel maid he allegedly tried to rape. First, I must explain that it wasn’t his Jewishness that made him force himself on the woman, but his Frenchness. Jews don’t tend to be rapists, just perverts.

Not that French tend to be “rapists” per se; it’s just a hazier term there since declining sex isn’t normal or common, and so “rape” as such isn’t common.

Regardless, the news of the Jew trying to rape a Muslim should at least satisfy this woman, who won an award from Hebrew University for arguing that IDF soldiers NOT raping Muslim women is a form of racism.

In other words, Strauss-Kahn may be a rapist, but at least he’s no racist!

My main objection to Anthony Weiner is not his having tweeted his genitalia; it’s his role as point man for policies that are profoundly destructive to the US. For that, the blame belongs to the ignoramuses in his district who elected him.

From the viewpoint of US national interests, the real EPIC FAIL here is all about Weiner’s wife, Huma Abedin, and her connection with the Clintons. It has been going on for a very long time, and it has largely escaped notice in the press.

I find it problematic that both a prominent US Congressman and the current Secretary of State are, literally as well as figuratively, in bed with a Muslimah.

Talk about sleeping with the enemy!

If Hillary Clinton had a lesbian affair with Huma Abedin then everything in Weinergate fits

(h/t: Sparta)

By Kevin “Coach” Collins

People are motivated to follow their darker instincts by lust for money power or sex.

In mid 2007 rumors started to circulate about Huma Abedin a stunningly beautiful staffer working for Hillary Clinton. The wagging tongues of Washington asked logical questions about Huma. “If Hillary is bisexual (as had long been thought and occasionally uttered in public), what is the nature of her relationship with the dark eyed enchanting Abedin, a young lady from a strict Muslim family?”

“Is the fact that Huma was never seen twice in the same designer outfit and lived in a $649,000 condo explainable because she was trading sexual favors with Hillary for a fabulous lifestyle?” “If so what does that make Huma?”

“How did Huma, whose government salary was listed as $9,999, live as she did?”

“Is Hillary Clinton a lesbian?”

Is Huma Abedin her lesbian “kept woman?”

In 2007 Michael Musto a Village Voice columnist who writes about gay issues commented that Hillary might be “Gayle King-ing” Huma, that is getting her a higher profile in order to head off media scrutiny about her and why Clinton would be “hiding” Huma and the true nature of their relationship.

In her tell all book about her affair with Bill Clinton Gennifer Flowers wrote that when she asked Bill if Hillary is a lesbian he laughed and made reference to her being more experienced with women then he is.

The purpose of this essay is NOT to prove Hillary Clinton and Huma Abedin are lesbians, but to raise the question: If they are daughters of Sapphos wouldn’t it have been a good deal for Anthony Weiner to become Huma’s beard or faux husband?

Killing any rumor of a lesbian relationship between Hillary and Huma would be very helpful to Hillary’s drive to be elected president, and a “President Hillary Clinton” would be enormously helpful to Weiner’s long held dream of being elected Mayor of New York City.

The coverage of Weinergate has nibbled around the edges. The reports have carefully avoided mentioning the scandal’s “third rail”: the relationship between Huma Abedin Congressman Anthony Weiner’s wife and her former boss Hillary Clinton. Nevertheless, if this is the root of the relationship between Huma and Weiner the whole ugly affair falls into place.

Bill Clinton understands all to well what it’s like to live with a women like Hillary. He knows what it can drive an ordinary man to do. Anthony Weiner’s tweets to a porn star may be motivated by more than mere curiosity.

The biggest motivators driving human behavior are money power and sex. This one has all three.

To contact your Congressional Representative use this link:

Much more here.

Zimbio: Hillary Clinton’s Lesbian lover Huma Abedin?

(h/t: Sparta)

The August issue of American Vogue featured an article on Huma Abedin, the traveling chief of staff for presidential hopeful, Hillary Clinton. As observed on Gawker, the Vogue article is lengthy but lacks substance similar to the Observer piece in April. Huma is characterized in short as a control freak, beautiful and a force to be reckon with. Yet, there isn’t much evidence of her intellect and capabilities outside of showing composure in designer clothes and accessories and having a keen understanding of political dynamics in the Middle East having lived there until her teens and raised by parents who are professors and of Indian and Pakistani descent. She has worked for Clinton as an intern/aide since graduating from George Washington. I just don’t see how she can be sought out for her expertise in matters related to the Middle East when she hasn’t worked in an objective international capacity outside of being Clinton’s aide. If she has, the authors of the artices in Vogue and the Observer should have pointed that out rather than rely on just the opinions of others. How about demonstrating the woman’s true smart rather than focusing on how smart and polish she looks in an Yves Saint Laurent suit?

It is worrying too that high power people in Washington like Senator Clinton is heavily relying on the advice of people who haven’t had extensive professional experience in international politics. Even if she grew up in the Middle East, I think that things have changed drastically in the 12+ years she has been away in Washington at college and working for Clinton. Somehow I don’t think that growing up in Saudi Arabia was so bad.

I’m sure that Senator Clinton have some very smart people working for her which makes me surprise that they allow such articles to be printed. Not so much the fact that the articles has a lot of fluff painting Huma as a super-woman, a wonder-kid. By putting forth the image of Huma and Hillary has dynamic, stylish, professional women, they are widening the gap between Senator Clinton and middle America, a weakness of her campaign. I would hope that America is ready for a woman president. However, I’m not sure if America knows how to relate to a woman presidential candidate and the fact that she’s an accomplished lawyer/politician woman makes it even worse. There’s no need to paint a perfect picture of these women to give the average Joes and Janes out there more reason to stay clear of Hillary Clinton…

Much more here.

Also see:

But wait, there’s MORE:

Saleha Abedin, Huma Abedin's mother
Saleha Abedin, Huma Abedin’s mother:
Will Huma look like her in twenty years?

Anthony Weiner’s mother-in-law, Saleha Abedin, is connected with Muslim Brotherhood

{ 7 comments… read them below or add one }

1 ER June 10, 2011 at 3:11 pm

more interesting is that Huma’s not only the daughter of conservative Muslims, but of a dad who was an Islamic scholar and a mother teaching in Saudi Arabia — now really, are they & their society going to be so quiet about their daughter’s disobedience to Islamic prohibition of Muslim women marrying a non-Muslim. Would their daughter, raised in Saudi Arabia, with their mother still working there, do such a thing unless it was in accord with the exception to the rule (like spying). And then of all the non-Muslim politicians to marry, that “coincidentally” she chose an up and coming (no pun intended) socialist Democrat in America’s living & working in America’s most prominent cities of NY and DC also seems a bit much. I don’t buy it.

2 1389 June 10, 2011 at 4:41 pm

There are no coincidences in politics. We don’t know which Muslim(s) sent Huma to be, for all intents and purposes, an enemy agent. Yes, it could be Huma’s mother or another relative. Or she could be acting on behalf of the Muslim agenda on her own.

But all of this may be starting to backfire. One can only hope…

Here’s what is pegging the irony meter (those jokes just keep writing themselves, don’t they?) – Bill Clinton reportedly is frustrated that Anthony Weiner hasn’t resigned.

The Clintons want back into the White House in the worst sort of way. If this scandal keeps getting media coverage, then eventually people will catch on to the whole national security issue of Hillary as a presidential wannabee who is literally in bed with a Muslimah.

We are not supposed to notice that Huma might have had a lot to do with Hillary’s hatred of the Serbs, and with her willingness to work for the obviously pro-Muslim Obama.

3 Hesperado June 10, 2011 at 8:19 pm

Also worthy of note was Hugh Fitzgerald’s essay posted on Jihad Watch over four years ago, at the time the questions about Huma Abedin and Hillary Clinton were surfacing:

“Legitimate questions about Huma and Hillary”

4 1389 June 10, 2011 at 8:47 pm


Your link was via Google Cache. This link reaches the current version:

Fitzgerald: Legitimate questions for Hillary and Huma

5 Exurban June 11, 2011 at 1:45 pm

“In her tell all book about her affair with Bill Clinton Gennifer Flowers wrote that when she asked Bill if Hillary is a lesbian he laughed and made reference to her being more experienced with women then he is.”

Much too euphemistic. Gennifer (by far the most appealing of Bill’s squeezes — he thought so too, and carried on with her for eleven years) actually quoted Bill as saying “She’s eaten more p***y than I have”. Crass perhaps, but the direct quote tells you more about the Clinton mentality. How unfortunate that we did not have the Internet in its current form during the Clinton presidency.

Continuing with he deficiencies of the media, how absurd it is that Huma Abedin is described as “beautiful” and “brilliant”. The average guy probably looks at the picture above and thinks “Hey, I went out with better-looking women than that when I was living in my car”. As for her intelligence, she did marry Congressman Weiner.

6 fearthesame June 13, 2011 at 9:19 pm

Liberals always tout their people as smart about everything. I remember some of Clinton’s fans touting that he did the NY Time crossword puzzle everyday, in ink ❗ , as if there weren’t several dozen copies of the NY Times floating around the White House in case he made a mistake. Maybe he just didn’t like to sharpen pencils. Then when his memoir “My LIfe” came out. Some were actually shocked that it wasn’t a literary masterpiece, as if he’d shown any writing talent previously. Similarily with the One, while the MSM like to feed the birthers, they’ve pretty much ignoring the much better argued case that Obama’s books were both ghostwritten. In fact, Obama’s pre-senatorial career looks to be a lot of hot-air and resume padding. Naturally any gaffes they make are treating very differently if a conservative republican remarks.

7 sinanju June 14, 2011 at 2:44 am

I took note of the lesbian rumors during campaign 08′ as well. At the time I took them with a 2 1/2 lb bag of salt, as this was the silly season and ugly rumors were routinely floated at such times but now this sharp-chinned, high-cheekboned, raven-tressed beast has once again arisen. My mind is finally made up. Yes. Hillary and Huma, sittin’ in a tree… With Anthony Weiner playing the part of “beard”.

It all makes sense now, Weiner needed a wife, Huma needed a husband and at least one token child (a la Chelsea) to establish their respectability in their respective quests for higher office (though there has never been any indication Huma intends to run for anything) Weiner needed to be married and a dad if he was going to run for mayor of NYC (think Jimmy McGreevy) and Huma needed to scotch the lesbian whispers once-and-for-all. So! An arranged marriage worthy of any royal house of Europe.

In doing so, Weiner earned the gratitude of House Clinton with who knows what long-term benefits to his career. Meanwhile, Huma spent most of her time trotting the globe at the heels of her semi-Sapphic boss and Weiner could enjoy the ease of an “open” marriage. Or maybe not. I wish I knew his previous sexual history, perhaps his obsessive tweeting was his only outlet. Perhaps committing physical adultery was barred in whatever contract he signed with the Duke of Hot Springs.

Either way, events of the last two weeks have blown that up real good. The secondary explosions and fallout will be exquisite. Weiner could not have handled things any worse than he has. Perhaps he could have brazened things out on the first day–held a press conference to say: “Yeah I did it and so what? Some silly tweets and pix, I never laid a hand on anyone”–but no, instead we were treated to a bizarre ten day circus of hilarious non-denial denials, clumsy attempts at misdirection, hurling insults at his friends in the MSM, then outright lies, all of which raised a fluttering red cape to Breitbart and the Rather-gaters.

The good old drip, drip, drip is taking it’s inevitable toll. First it was Weiner’s barely contained tumescence, then Weiner’s love tackle in all it’s waxed and shaven glory, then his various bare chested vogueing in the House gym, then finally, his barely draped greek statue impression.

The man’s desperation must be considerable. Why, oh why is it the politician’s-for-life who most often cause scandal? He has been a political hack from the age of 21. Aide to Chuckie Schumer, NYC councilman, U.S. Congressman, not a day spent in the real world. Unlike Spitzer, he is not a wealthy scion and if he slinks away from office as a figure of scandal and ridicule he can forget about supping at the gravy trough or riding the revolving door. No lobbying shop, hedge fund, corporate board or foundation is going to touch him. I am guessing, that right now, yea, even as we speak, he is on the phone in his cybersex rehab center (if he actually went to any such) in frantic negotiation , trying to hammer out some Blagojevich-ian deal that will set him up for life in return for going quietly.

As for Huma, I have no idea what she will do. Correction, she will do as she’s told, I just don’t know what her orders will be.

Once again, of course. It is proven that the legacy media can no longer control the narrative. Their ability to bury inconvenient truths and steer the national conversation is a thing of the past. They are so short-handed that they now have to request their readers help in digging for dirt in Sarah Palin’s gubernatorial emails. Imagine that. Pathetic.

Hmmm, as long as we’re on the subject of “set for life”… I wonder about all those dems who were turned out of office in 2010 for their votes on ObamaCare? I suspected at the time that they were all made extravagant promises if they fell on their swords for Le Grande Barry. I wish someone might take the time to investigate them enough to see how they are currently making their daily bread. Have they all been “taken care of”?

Leave a Comment

{ 9 trackbacks }

Previous post:

Next post: