Breitbart has the story:

(877) 888-4319: Norquist, Rubio Allies to Paint Immigration Bill Opponents as Nativists on Conference Call

An employee of Grover Norquist’s Americans for Tax Reform (ATR), together with a political ally of “Gang of Eight” member Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL), will argue Friday that groups opposed to the immigration bill pending in the U.S. Senate are “nativists,” Breitbart News has learned.

 
by Matthew Boyle 13 Jun 2013

ATR’s Josh Culling and Hispanic Leadership Fund (HLF) president Mario Lopez will make the argument on a conference call with mainstream media reporters on Friday at 11 AM EDT. Brad Bailey of an organization called Texas Immigration Studies will join them on the call.

“As the momentum behind immigration reform continues to build and strengthen, an anti-immigrant opposition is working to scuttle and kill immigration efforts in Congress,” those organizing the press call said in a release obtained by Breitbart News (emphasis added):

Many of these groups are deeply associated with John Tanton, the father of the modern anti-immigrant movement, and his network of nativist groups, including the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS), NumbersUSA, and the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR).  Over the years, Tanton’s network has extended its reach beyond these groups and to some of the most vocal opponents of immigration reform in Congress. [emphasis added]

The authors of the press release added that Culling, Lopez and Bailey–described in the release as “conservative leaders”–will “dive deep into the inner-workings of John Tanton’s network–including its influence on legislators, its ties to radical population control activists, and its opposition to all immigration (including legal immigration)==and discuss the potential implications of the Tanton network and its involvement in the current immigration debate.”

Culling is ATR’s Government Affairs Manager and is working on Norquist’s behalf to lobby for the passage of the Gang of Eight legislation in the Senate. Lopez is working specifically with Rubio to do the same.

In February, Lopez distributed a paper with his byline around Capitol Hill promoting a similar message to this press release. According to the Washington Post’s Peter Wallsten, in early February, Rubio and his staff brought Lopez into meetings to encourage him to discredit groups like the Center for Immigration Studies, NumbersUSA, and Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR).

“Rubio’s aides last week brought one of the organizers of the effort to undermine the groups, Mario H. Lopez, a party strategist on Hispanic politics, to a regular meeting of GOP Senate staffers, at which Lopez distributed literature about the groups’ backgrounds and connections,” Wallsten wrote on February 13. “Rubio also raised concerns about the groups’ leanings during a recent conference call on immigration with conservative activists.”

Wallsten noted at the time that Rubio spokesman Alex Conant said the Senator “has argued that some groups that oppose legal immigration should not be considered part of the conservative coalition,” and the “vast majority of Republicans strongly support legal immigration.” Conant has not responded to requests for comment from Breitbart News regarding these remarks, nor has Rubio’s outreach director, J.R. Sanchez, or his chief of staff, Cesar Conda.

Lopez’s ties to Rubio go back to the Florida junior Senator’s early days in national politics. Lopez touted his support for Rubio from the very beginning of his campaign for Senate. “From the moment that the establishment lined up behind Charlie Crist, the Hispanic Leadership Fund stood up to say that Marco Rubio was the type of leader who belonged in the Senate,” Lopez said in a statement the night Rubio was elected to the U.S. Senate.

Further, Lopez has given quotes to news outlets defending the Senate’s immigration bill and specifically Rubio. “People appreciate his kind of leadership and that he’s taking such a thoughtful approach to the immigration issue,” Lopez said of Rubio, according to the National Journal’s Beth Reinhard. “People appreciate him stepping up.”

When Lopez previously accused the bill’s opponents of “nativism” earlier this year, Rubio’s team did not publicly rebuke the attacks. According to the Daily Caller’s Neil Munro, Rubio spokesman Conant “downplayed the revelations” that the Senator worked with Lopez on the attack.

Lopez tried to organize a similar conference call on Tuesday but canceled it at the last minute due to what call organizers described as scheduling conflicts. Breitbart News’ Mike Flynn reported before they canceled that call that these figures’ research “draw[s] heavily on” information compiled by the left-wing Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC).

Flynn reported that the original Tuesday call “was scheduled to take place as the Senate was having its first floor vote on the Gang bill.”

The phone number at which they will present this argument on Friday morning at 11 AM EDT is 877-888-4319. The password for the conference call is “TANTON.”

Oh, and by the way, Grover Norquist is a reprehensible Muslim Brotherhood mole.

{ 2 comments }

This is my response to Michael Voris’ rant against the Roman Catholic clergy’s “Gay Mafia”:

http://www.churchmilitant.tv/daily/?today=2013-05-15

(You may need to register to see this video. Such registration is free.)

Michael Voris
Michael Voris

Michael Voris, wake up! The Roman Catholic clergy is a homosexual-dominated clergy and always will be until the church renounces the sadistic practice of requiring all priests to be celibate. OK, I myself was never abused by a Roman Catholic priest, but we sure heard those rumors about what to expect as a male upperclassmen. There are thousands like me who just put our heads in the sand and waited. Personally, I left the Roman church shortly after Vatican II, but had I remained, I certainly would have left when I learned that the vast majority of its clergy were homosexual.

What you could do, Michael, is to help lead your faithful crowd away from the gay-friendly Roman church and over to the one Holy, Catholic Apostolic Church, better known as the “Eastern Orthodox Church.” Yes, we are Catholic, but NOT Roman. Like every other clergy, our clergy sins, but we don’t go out of our way to create the occasion for it with the unbelievable demand of a completely celibate priesthood.

Food for thought anyway, Michael. God will thank if you do.

Yes, the “gay mafia” is real:

Pope Francis says ‘gay lobby’ at work inside the Vatican

VATICAN CITY – In private remarks to the leadership of a key Latin American church group, Pope Francis lamented that a “gay lobby” was at work at the Vatican.

It was an apparent reference to allegations in the Italian media that blackmail was taking place within the Vatican against high-ranking prelates who are gay.

The Latin American and Caribbean Confederation of Religious — the regional organization for priests and nuns of religious orders — confirmed Tuesday that its leaders had written a synthesis of Francis’ remarks after their June 6 audience. The group, known by its Spanish acronym CLAR, said it was greatly distressed that the document had been published and apologized to the pope.

In the document, Francis is quoted as saying that while there were many holy people in the Vatican, there was also a current of corruption. “The `gay lobby’ is mentioned, and it is true, it is there … We need to see what we can do …” the synthesis reads.

The Vatican spokesman, the Rev. Federico Lombardi, said Tuesday the audience was private and that as a result he had nothing to say.
[...]
More here.

{ 0 comments }

Blame political correct multiculturalism – and the Muslim Brotherhood moles who have thoroughly infested the federal government. NSA dragnet surveillance wouldn’t have stopped 9-11-01 either. Before the attack, clues were abundant and readily available, but nobody acted upon them. Remember the “failure to connect the dots”?

On YouTube:

YouTube Preview Image

Published on Jun 14, 2013 by yazchat
Fort Hood attacker had online terror ties.
Fox News: America’s Newsroom
http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/americas-newsroom/index.html
Fox News Insider: The Official Live Blog of Fox News Channel
http://foxnewsinsider.com/
Fox News Live Wall Chat
http://foxnewsinsider.com/live-wall/
Fox News Tweets
https://twitter.com/FoxNews
Fox News
http://www.foxnews.com/

{ 3 comments }

On YouTube:

YouTube Preview Image

Published on Jun 14, 2013 by yazchat

Where is Media Coverage of IRS? Brent Bozell of the Media Research Center on the lack of coverage recently on the IRS scandal.
News Busters: Bozell, Hannity Note Broadcast Nets Ignoring IRS Abuses Uncovered by CNSNews.com [LINK]
Fox Business: Varney & Co. w/ Stuart Varney
http://www.foxbusiness.com/on-air/varney-co/index.html
Fox Business
http://foxbusiness.com/
Media Research Center
http://www.mrc.org/
News Busters
http://www.newsbusters.org/
MRC TV
http://www.mrctv.org/

{ 0 comments }

On YouTube:

YouTube Preview Image

Published on Jun 11, 2013 by yazchat
Allen West reacts to the comedian’s advice.
Fox News: Hannity – The Great American Blog
http://hannity.blogs.foxnews.com/
Fox News: Hannity
http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/hannity/index.html
Fox News Insider: The Official Live Blog of Fox News Channel
http://foxnewsinsider.com/
Fox News Live Wall Chat
http://foxnewsinsider.com/live-wall/
Fox News Tweets
https://twitter.com/FoxNews
Fox News
http://www.foxnews.com/

{ 3 comments }

On YouTube:

YouTube Preview Image

Published on Jun 14, 2013 by Acts17Apologetics

For the sources I cited or referred to in the video, visit the following link:
http://www.answeringmuslims.com/2013/06/sacrificing-our-daughters-on-psychology.html

In Great Britain, young white girls are being drugged, gang-raped, and tortured by Muslim men. These brutal attacks are occurring so frequently and in so many cities, it would be positively irrational not to look for a connection. So, why are Muslim rape-gangs targeting young British girls and treating them as if they’re worthless? Perhaps the answers are in the Qur’an.

{ 2 comments }

UK: The Crisis of Female Genital Mutilation

Despite these laws, no one has ever been prosecuted for performing FGM. Victims are often afraid to speak out for fear of physical abuse or death threats, some involving paid hitmen.

By Soeren Kern May 9, 2013 at 5:00 am

British authorities are redoubling their fight against the spiraling problem of female genital mutilation (FGM) after a weekly primetime television show broadcast by the BBC forced the previously “taboo” subject into mainstream debate.

FGM is endemic in Muslim-majority countries across Africa, Asia and the Middle East. Three million girls between infancy and age 15 are subject to FGM every year, and it is believed that 140 million women worldwide are suffering from the lifelong consequences of the practice.

FGM has emerged as a major problem in Europe due to mass immigration. The European Parliament estimates that 500,000 girls and women in the European Union are living with FGM, and every year another 180,000 girls in Europe are at risk of being “cut.”

Britain has the highest levels of FGM in Europe. According to a government-funded study published in 2007, at least 66,000 women and girls in Britain have had the procedure performed on them, and more than 20,000 girls under the age of 15 are currently at risk.

These figures, however, may be only the tip of the iceberg. A 2011 Department of Health policy paper warns that “it is possible that, due to population growth and immigration from practicing countries…FGM is significantly more prevalent than these figures suggest.”

FGM is thought to be common in Britain among immigrant groups from Egypt, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Gambia, Indonesia, Iraq, Kenya, Kurdistan, Liberia, Mali, Nigeria, Northern Sudan, Pakistan, Sierra Leone, Somalia and Yemen.

The Times of London has reported that circumcisers — also known as “house doctors” because they conduct the procedure in private homes — are often flown to Britain from Africa and the Middle East to carry out the mutilations.

Alternatively, families who have immigrated to Britain from countries where FGM is practiced may send their daughters back to those countries to undergo FGM there, ostensibly under the guise of visiting relatives.

According to The Guardian, the six-week-long school summer holiday in Britain is the most dangerous time of the year for these girls. It is a convenient time to carry out the procedure because the girls need several weeks to heal before returning to school.

Sometimes immigrants living in other European countries even send their daughters to Britain to have them mutilated there. In an interview with the BBC, Isabelle Gillette-Faye, an anti-FGM activist in France, recounts the story of two little girls about to board a train for London.

Gillette-Faye says: “It was a Friday. We heard just in time. They had tickets for Saturday. A family member tipped us off. We told the police and they were stopped from making the journey.” The parents were warned that if they would go ahead with the mutilations and be found out, they would be imprisoned for up to 13 years.

“In England,” she added, “you are very respectful of your immigrants. It is very different in France. They have to integrate and they have to obey our laws. We simply will not tolerate this practice.”

In Bristol, a city in southwest England with a sizeable immigrant community, it is believed that some 2,000 girls are at risk of “FGM parties.” According to the BBC, “They cut them all together, as a group, because it is cheaper and quicker that way. At first the girls are all excited because it’s a party, until they realize what is going to happen, and then they get frightened. It’s done by the elder women, or the Imam, whoever is expert at cutting.”

FGM has been a crime in Britain for more than 25 years. It was made a criminal offense by the Prohibition of Female Circumcision Act 1985. That Act was superseded by the Female Genital Mutilation Act 2003 and (in Scotland) by the Prohibition of Female Genital Mutilation (Scotland) Act 2005, both of which also introduce extraterritoriality. Taking a British citizen or permanent resident abroad for the purpose of FGM is a criminal offense whether or not it is lawful in the country to which the girl is taken.

Despite these laws — which carry a maximum sentence of 14 years in prison for anyone convicted of carrying out FGM or helping it to take place — no one in Britain has ever been prosecuted for performing it.

One reason for the lack of prosecutions is the difficulty in gathering evidence because the victims of FGM are often afraid to speak out. Girls and women who do speak out against FGM have suffered verbal and physical abuse from adult men and women in their communities in London, Bristol, Cardiff and Manchester in attempts to silence them.

The Sunday Times recently reported that a 29-year-old British-Somalian woman named Nimko Ali had received death threats — a man she considered a friend had offered a hitman £500 ($775) to murder her — since going public in February as a victim of the practice. Intimidation also involves threatening phone calls, emails, texts and tweets.

Another reason for Britain’s dismal record at bringing perpetrators to justice is tolerance of FGM due to political correctness and concerns over “cultural sensitivity.” Although the mainstream media routinely take pains to avoid any insinuation that FGM has anything to do with Islam, doctrinally, historically, geographically and juridically, the practice is intrinsically linked to Islam. As a result, there is a reluctance to tackle FGM because doing so is perceived as attacking Islam. This, however, may be about to change.
[...]
Read the rest.

{ 0 comments }

B92/Tanjug has the story:

Valery Alekseev (L) and Tomislav Nikolić in Belgrade on Wednesday (Tanjug)
Valery Alekseev (L) and Tomislav Nikolić in Belgrade on Wednesday (Tanjug)

BELGRADE — The friendship between Serbia and Russia is made of unbreakable ties that reach far into the past, and nobody can deny us this love, says Tomislav Nikolić.

The Serbian leader made the statement as he met in Belgrade on Wednesday with International Fund for the Unity of Orthodox Peoples’ President Valery Alekseev.

“The Orthodox faith binds us together, as does our joint fight for freedom and justice,” a statement from the president’s cabinet said, and added that Nikolić during the meeting stressed the importance of the building of St. Sava’s Temple in Belgrade, in which Russia has a significant role.

“This holy place has special value for Serbia, and its renewal would be almost impossible without the participation of our Russian friends,” he was quoted as saying.

Alekseev explained that the organization he is heading works to strengthen “the Orthodox public” in various countries, with the goal of promoting high Christian and cultural values in a modern society.

The Russian guest emphasized that special effort has been made when it came to the Fund’s activities in the Balkans, where several chapters had been set up, tasked primarily with educational activities and in cooperation with Serbia’s state and Church circles.

InSerbia: Serbian-Russian relations at high level

Russian Ambassador to Serbia Aleksandr Chepurin
Russian Ambassador to Serbia Aleksandr Chepurin

Source: http://www.tanjug.rs/

BELGRADE – The relations between Serbia and Russia are at a very high level and they continue to follow an upward trend, it was stated by the two countries’ officials at a reception in the Russian Embassy on the occasion of Russia Day on Wednesday evening.

Russian Ambassador to Serbia Aleksandr Chepurin said at the opening of the ceremonial reception that Russia is on a constant rise, and on this path it is constantly trying to strengthen its cooperation with the brotherly Serbian people.

Noting that Russia has a 1,150 year-long history, Chepurin said that the two countries have similar pasts through which the names of their countries constantly changed, while the name of the peoples remained the same.

The Russian ambassador stated with regret that Serbian President Tomislav Nikolic, Prime Minister Ivica Dacic and First Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister Aleksandar Vucic could not attend the reception, which brought together around 2,000 people.

President Nikolic and Prime Minister Dacic addressed the guests via video link, and congratulated Russia Day to all citizens of the Russian Federation.

Nikolic said that the relations between the two countries are at a very high level.
“If it were up to the peoples, we would be even closer and our cooperation and ties would be even better. All for the benefit of our peoples,” the president said.

Nikolic noted that recently he and Russian President Vladimir Putin signed an agreement on strategic partnership, whose benefits are yet to become visible to the citizens of the two countries.

“Big Russian investments are emerging. Russia is heading one great part of the progressive world. When Russia is doing well, Serbia is doing well also. When Russia is facing a problem, Serbia is facing a problem also,” Nikolic said.

Dacic stated that at the moment Serbia and Russia have one of the highest levels of cooperation in their history.

He expressed Serbia’s firm commitment to continue to develop political, economic and all other kinds of cooperation with Russia.

Serbian Parliament Speaker Nebojsa Stefanovic said that he is certain that the strategic partnership, traditional friendship and understanding between the two peoples will continue to develop.

“The history of our peoples is as long as the entire history of Russia and Serbia. We have always been inextricably linked and turned to one another,” Stefanovic said.

Serbian Patriarch Irinej said that Russia offered support to the Serbian people both in the past and today, pointing to the brotherly tie between the two peoples throughout history.

{ 1 comment }

The precedent was set in the 1990s, when the Clintons falsely accused the Christian Serbs of the atrocities that their enemies had been committing – and used that as an excuse to help the al-Qaeda-affiliated Muslims in the Balkans.

Some of these same Balkans jihadis have traveled to Syria and joined the insurgents.

Sheik Yer’Mami has the story:

The Moonbat Messiah is consistent in supporting our enemies. Why is he not impeached?

US offers ‘military support’ to Syrian rebels

President Obama’s decision comes after White House determines Syrian regime used chemical weapons against opposition. (which is false.)

Rand Paul says U.S. taxpayers are funding a ‘war on Christianity’

“There is a war on Christianity,” Paul told an audience of mostly evangelical Christians and Jews during a luncheon at the annual Faith and Freedom Conference in Washington. “Not just from liberal elites here at home, but worldwide. And your government, or more correctly, you, the taxpayer, are funding it. You are being taxed to send money to countries that are not only intolerant of Christians, but openly hostile. Christians are imprisoned and threatened with death for their beliefs.”

Obama promises more aid to Al Qaeda-linked jihadists in Syria, Claims ‘Red Line’ crossed on Chemical Weapons Use, despite UN Human Rights Counter claims  (Pamela Geller)

United Nations human rights investigators said they have gathered testimony from outside Syria suggesting rebels, not Bashar Assad’s regime, may have used chemical weapons.

“Our investigators have been in neighboring countries interviewing victims, doctors and field hospitals and, according to their report of last week which I have seen, there are strong, concrete suspicions but not yet incontrovertible proof of the use of sarin gas, from the way the victims were treated,” Carla Del Ponte, a member of the independent commission of inquiry on Syria, told Swiss-Italian television. “This was use on the part of the opposition, the rebels, not by the government authorities.”

But as is Obama’s want, he creates his own narrative to side with jihadists and Islamic supremacists. (More)
[...]
Much more here; read it all.

Reuters: Obama OKs sending some U.S. arms to Syrian rebels: source

WASHINGTON | Thu Jun 13, 2013 8:35pm EDT

(Reuters) – President Barack Obama has authorized sending some U.S. weapons to Syrian rebels for the first time as a part of a new package of military support to the opposition in the fight to overthrow Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, a source close to the matter said on Thursday.

There was no immediate word on the type of weaponry the United States would provide or when it would be delivered. The White House said earlier that Obama had approved direct military assistance to the beleaguered rebels but declined to give details or say whether any of it would be lethal equipment.

(Reporting by Matt Spetalnick; Editing by Eric Walsh)

Also see:

{ 1 comment }

Thanks for making this video, Doc, but you are missing the point. There is no such thing as “moderate” Islam. If you truly believe that you are a “moderate Muslim”, you are just kidding yourself.

Either you see Islam for what it is, a system of politically tyranny masquerading as a religion, or you are an unwitting supporter of this Satanic death cult. If you really are against radical Islam, leave it. Just admit that Allah is NOT any sort of a god, but merely an evil demon and that Mohammad was a false prophet.

Where you go from there is up to you. Of course, we recommend the Holy Orthodox Church. We could use more fine men and women in our ranks. Please consider it.

The Third Jihad – Radical Islam’s Vision for America

YouTube Preview Image

Published on Nov 21, 2012 by ClarionProductions

Learn more at http://www.clarionproject.org – The Third Jihad is an in-depth documentary film that exposes the war the media is not telling you about. It reveals the enemy our government is too afraid to name.

One person who is not afraid to speak out is Dr. Zuhdi Jasser, a Muslim American and former physician to the US Congress.

After the FBI released a radical Islamist manifesto describing how to destroy America from within, Dr. Jasser decides to investigate.

The Third Jihad is about what he discovered.

Check out Clarion Project’s website to learn more: http://www.clarionproject.org

DVD’s can be purchased here: http://www.thethirdjihad.com

{ 3 comments }

NSA satellite in sky: 'Attention! The war on terror is over! But just to be sure, we're monitoring your telephone activities.'

The last thing that Obama and his henchmen want is to capture Muslim terrorists or deter their attacks. Without a ready supply of terrorists, they’d have to find a different excuse for taking away our liberties.

Investors.com: Obama’s Snooping Excludes Mosques, Missed Boston Bombers

(h/t: Weasel Zippers)

Homeland Insecurity: The White House assures that tracking our every phone call and keystroke is to stop terrorists, and yet it won’t snoop in mosques, where the terrorists are.

That’s right, the government’s sweeping surveillance of our most private communications excludes the jihad factories where homegrown terrorists are radicalized.

Since October 2011, mosques have been off-limits to FBI agents. No more surveillance or undercover string operations without high-level approval from a special oversight body at the Justice Department dubbed the Sensitive Operations Review Committee.

Who makes up this body, and how do they decide requests? Nobody knows; the names of the chairman, members and staff are kept secret.

We do know the panel was set up under pressure from Islamist groups who complained about FBI stings at mosques. Just months before the panel’s formation, the Council on American-Islamic Relations teamed up with the ACLU to sue the FBI for allegedly violating the civil rights of Muslims in Los Angeles by hiring an undercover agent to infiltrate and monitor mosques there.

Before mosques were excluded from the otherwise wide domestic spy net the administration has cast, the FBI launched dozens of successful sting operations against homegrown jihadists — inside mosques — and disrupted dozens of plots against the homeland.

If only they were allowed to continue, perhaps the many victims of the Boston Marathon bombings would not have lost their lives and limbs. The FBI never canvassed Boston mosques until four days after the April 15 attacks, and it did not check out the radical Boston mosque where the Muslim bombers worshipped.

The bureau didn’t even contact mosque leaders for help in identifying their images after those images were captured on closed-circuit TV cameras and cellphones.

One of the Muslim bombers made extremist outbursts during worship, yet because the mosque wasn’t monitored, red flags didn’t go off inside the FBI about his increasing radicalization before the attacks.

This is particularly disturbing in light of recent independent surveys of American mosques, which reveal some 80% of them preach violent jihad or distribute violent literature to worshippers.

What other five-alarm jihadists are counterterrorism officials missing right now, thanks to restrictions on monitoring the one area they should be monitoring?

{ 0 comments }

Tiny flying pig

Flying pig moment: CNN article makes sense!

Why NSA spying scares the world

By Ronald Deibert, Special to CNN
updated 2:54 PM EDT, Wed June 12, 2013

Editor’s note: Ronald Deibert is a professor of political science at the University of Toronto, where he is director of the Canada Centre for Global Security Studies and the Citizen Lab at the Munk School of Global Affairs. He is author of “Black Code: Inside the Battle for Cyberspace” (Signal/McClelland & Stewart, 2013).

(CNN) — In 2011, I was on a panel, organized by the security company RSA, with two retired National Security Agency directors, Michael Hayden and Kenneth Minihan. During the course of our debate, I raised concerns, as the only non-American on the panel, that their plans and preferences for having the NSA secure cyberspace for the rest of us were not exactly reassuring. To this, Minihan replied that I should not describe myself as “Canadian” but rather “North American.”

As jarring as his response was, the fact of the matter is when it comes to communications, he’s right. Practically speaking, there is no border separating Canadian from U.S. telecommunications — though that’s not true the other way around. Primarily, this one-way dependence is a product of history and economics. Canadians’ communications are inextricably connected to networks south of the border and subject to the laws and practices of the U.S. over which we, as foreigners, have no say or control.

For American citizens, the recent NSA scandal has touched off soul-searching discussions about the legality of mass surveillance programs, whether they violate the Fourth and Fifth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution, and whether proper oversight and accountability exist to protect American citizens’ rights.

Indeed, with respect to the case of PRISM, NSA’s secret set of tools used to collect data about overseas Internet communications, some argue the program actually enhances those safeguards for Americans — because it appears that collection of company data was segregated in such a way to limit the collection to “foreign citizens.” As reassuring as this may be for Americans, for the rest of us non-Americans who enjoy our Gmail, Google Docs, and Facebook accounts, it’s definitely unsettling: We’re all fair game.

While cyberspace may be global, its infrastructure most definitely is not.

For example, a huge proportion of global Internet traffic flows through networks controlled by the United States, simply because eight of 15 global tier 1 telecommunications companies are American — companies like AT&T, CenturyLink, XO Communications and, significantly, Verizon.

The social media services that many of us take for granted are also mostly provided by giants headquartered in the United States, like Google, Facebook, Yahoo! and Twitter. All of these companies are subject to U.S. law, including the provisions of the U.S. Patriot Act, no matter where their services are offered or their servers located. Having the world’s Internet traffic routed through the U.S. and having those companies under its jurisdiction give U.S. national security agencies an enormous home-field advantage that few other countries enjoy.

But there are unintended consequences of the NSA scandal that will undermine U.S. foreign policy interests — in particular, the “Internet Freedom” agenda espoused by the U.S. State Department and its allies.

The revelations that have emerged will undoubtedly trigger a reaction abroad as policymakers and ordinary users realize the huge disadvantages of their dependence on U.S.-controlled networks in social media, cloud computing, and telecommunications, and of the formidable resources that are deployed by U.S. national security agencies to mine and monitor those networks.

For example, in 2012, Norwegian lawmakers debated a ban on the use by public officials of Google’s and Microsoft’s cloud computing services. Although shelved temporarily, this type of debate will almost certainly be resurrected and spread throughout Europe and other regions as the full scope of U.S.-based “foreign directed” wiretapping and metadata collection sinks in.

Already we can see regional traffic to the United States from Asia, Africa and even Latin America gradually declining, a trend that is almost certainly going to accelerate as those regions ramp up regional network exchange points and local services to minimize dependence on networks under U.S. control.

Many of the countries in the Southern Hemisphere are failed or fragile states; many of them are authoritarian or autocratic regimes. No doubt the elites in those regimes will use the excuse of security to adopt more stringent state controls over the Internet in their jurisdictions and support local versions of popular social media companies over which they can exact their own nationalized controls — a trend that began prior to the NSA revelations but which now has additional rhetorical support.

In the age of Big Data, the revelations about NSA’s intelligence-gathering programs touched many nerves. The issue of surveillance won’t go away, and Americans will need to figure out the appropriate safeguards for liberty in their democracy. It’s an important debate, but one that doesn’t include us “foreigners” that now make up the vast majority of the Internet users. Americans would do well to consider the international implications of their domestic policies before they come home to bite them.

More here.

Also see:

{ 0 comments }

What is Human?

by 1389 on June 13, 2013

in 1389 (blog admin), abortion/pro-life, evil

On YouTube:

YouTube Preview Image

Published on Jun 13, 2013 by LiveActionFilms
Learn more: http://www.liveaction.org/inhuman/

Also see:

{ 1 comment }

PJM: Your computer is bugging your house

Homer Simpson naked and terrified in Treehouse of Horror III

The computer you are sitting at right now probably has a microphone. It probably also has a camera looking at you this moment. Is it sending sound and pictures from inside your house to the PRISM program at NSA?

Who knows? But one thing is for sure — the technology is sitting there, on your desk. Welcome to Winston’s world.

Yesterday we crossed a line. What once seemed kooky is now happening. I figured this would be a fight for a future generation, but it is ours. The frightening future has arrived.
[...]
But no war, no threat, no nothing justifies the National Security Agency obtaining a direct pipeline to the Skype chats of every American. What possible justification is there for the government watching granddad talk to his grandkids in real time back in Laurel, Maryland?
More here.

Think it can’t happen?  It already has.

Obama with huge ears: 'As for the Verizon records...It's not like we're listening in or anything'

John Sexton on Breitbart asks: What if it is not just metadata the NSA is collecting?

The claim being made in public right now is that the NSA used section 215 of the Patriot Act to collect metadata on phone calls. However there is some evidence that the NSA is actually recording the content of phone calls.

Last week I published a clip of actor Shia LaBeouf claiming, on the Jay Leno show, that an FBI consultant on the movie Eagle Eye had played him a 2 year old clip of a private phone conversation. I noted at the time that this claim had to be taken with a grain of salt given that LaBeouf was on TV to promote a film about government monitoring of communications. But given that secret information sometimes leaks to Hollywood before the rest of us, it seemed worth mentioning.

But LaBeouf is not the only person who has made this claim about the NSA having access to private calls. Just last month former FBI counter-terrorism expert Tim Clemente appeared on the Erin Burnett show on CNN to discuss the Boston marathon bombing. The discussion turned to the possibility of charges against Tsarnaev’s wife. Burnett wondered if it would be possible to prove complicity given that there would be no way to know what they talked about on the phone. Here’s the exchange (audio is faint so you may need to turn it up)…
More here.

But that’s not all.

Even the most innocent, commonplace snapshots that you take with your smartphone can contain metadata that reveals personal information about your family.

“Smart appliances” including electrical meters, automotive systems such as OnStar, and other devices with embedded computers can be used to collect and extract information about your activities.

How about making sure that the politically disfavored classes will freeze in the dark? Bureaucrat-controlled thermostats are on the way.

Nakedsecurity urges computer users to log out of their profiles when finished with their activities. And don’t have the computer store your passwords. If you’re afraid you’ll forget a password and lock yourself out, you can always write your passwords on a piece of paper and lock it up in a safe that you own.

Then there’s Google Glass (h/t: Gramfan). Dry Bones shows how the device will work in the real world. Just what we need, another tool for cyberstalkers and government snoops!

Dry Bones takes on Google Glass

Nudists beware: Spy drones can see what you’re wearing (or not wearing) from 17500 feet.

Living in a rural area won’t keep you safe from totalitarian spying. Twitchy has the story on that:

Room for one more scandal? Senators probe EPA’s leak of farmers’ personal info

Having so many different Obama administration scandals demanding the public’s attention all at once almost works in the administration’s favor; before the full implications of one scandal sink in, another one erupts. While the NSA has managed to bump the IRS from the headlines this week, it’s worth noting that the Environmental Protection Agency is busy doing its part to erode what’s left of the public’s trust in the government.

The Free Beacon reported this week that 24 senators signed a letter demanding to know why the EPA leaked the personal information of more than 80,000 farms, includes names, phone numbers and personal addresses, to left-wing environmental groups like Earth Justice, the Pew Charitable Trust and the Natural Resources Defense Council. Ten states caught sending the personal data recalled it for redaction and then resent it; Montana and Nebraska, however, ended up mistakenly resending the personal information.

Much more here.

The Conversation Prism - 2010
The Conversation Prism (2010 version) by Brian Solis and JESS3:
The grabbermint is watching and collecting it all

We stay tuned.

{ 1 comment }

I will be the first to admit that I am no fan of the German government in any of its incarnations, including the current one. But then, I’m a Serbian-American who has some Jewish relatives. Let’s just say that I get tired of their constant efforts to obliterate us.

This time, though, they’re spot on.

Checkpoint Charlie

Ed Driscoll has the story at PJM:

[...]
In June of 2013: “Germany to Spymaster-in-Chief Obama: You are on some Eastern Bloc $#!+ right now,” Jim Treacher quips:

Fearless Leader from Rocky and Bullwinkle
Fearless Leader from Rocky and Bullwinkle

Dude? When Germany is telling you to knock it off? Maybe you should listen. I know you won’t, but you should.

Reuters:

German outrage over a U.S. Internet spying program has broken out ahead of a visit by Barack Obama, with ministers demanding the president provide a full explanation when he lands in Berlin next week and one official likening the tactics to those of the East German Stasi.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s spokesman has said she will raise the issue with Obama in talks next Wednesday, potentially casting a cloud over a visit that was designed to celebrate U.S.-German ties on the 50th anniversary John F. Kennedy’s famous “Ich bin ein Berliner” speech.

Government surveillance is an extremely sensitive topic in Germany, where memories of the dreaded Stasi secret police and its extensive network of informants are still fresh in the minds of many citizens.

Yeah, Barry will need to update that classic speech a bit: “Ich bin ein Faschist Soziopath.”

Am I the only one who was reminded of the Stasi when the White House started telling us to inform on your fellow Americans who say things that “seem fishy”? Four years ago, you would’ve been called paranoid for likening that to the Stasi. Today, you’d have to be a partisan idiot not to be reminded of totalitarian Cold War tactics.

Well, as I noted in June of 2010, when the fallout from the JournoList scandal was breaking, involving the self-described “Non-Official Campaign” by leftwing journalists to elect Obama in 2008 (and 2012), JournoList member Walter Shapiro wrote an article titled “The Death of JournoList: Does Privacy End at the Edge of Your Thoughts?” I responded by noting that Shapiro’s headline “seems like a rather disingenuous question for a man of the left to ask, as this is where the terrain invariably ends up, the further and further one moves left,” adding, “You wanted East Germany on the Potomac? Might as well have all of the trappings, boys.”

Incidentally, today Politico is reporting that Obama oversaw the “Greatest Expansion of Electronic Surveillance In U.S. History.” (Link safe, goes to Big Journalism.) Without of course noting how deeply Politico was in the tank for Obama in 2008 (and 2012).
[...]
At Hot Air yesterday, Allahpundit wrote, “Lindsey Graham: Sure, I’d support censoring your mail if it was necessary to counterterrorism,” joking that “Libertarianism has no greater asset than this guy”:

“In World War II, the mentality of the public was that our whole way of life was at risk, we’re all in. We censored the mail. When you wrote a letter overseas, it got censored. When a letter was written back from the battlefield to home, they looked at what was in the letter to make sure they were not tipping off the enemy,” Graham, a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, told reporters on Capitol Hill. “If I thought censoring the mail was necessary, I would suggest it, but I don’t think it is.”…

“The First Amendment right to speak is sacrosanct, but it has limits,” Graham added. “In World War II, our population understood that what we say in letters could be used against [us by] our enemies. It was designed to protect us and ensure that we would have First Amendment rights because under the Japanese and Nazi regime, they weren’t that big into the First Amendment. We don’t need to censor the mail, but we do need to find out what the enemy’s up to.”

Wait ’til Graham discovers what we did in World War One. (But perhaps I shouldn’t give him any ideas.)

Related: In other news out of Germany, the New York Sun reports, “German Government Brands Goods Made in Factories That Are Owned by Jews”:

In light of its own sordid record during the 20th century, Germany and its leaders have a special responsibility to be exceptionally sensitive to such issues, particularly when they relate to Jews. After all, it was 80 years ago, in April 1933, that the Nazis launched a nationwide assault on Jewish owned businesses throughout Germany, painting yellow-and-black Stars of David on storefronts and discouraging people from patronizing them.

This was carried out under the slogan, “Kauft nicht bei Juden!” (Don’t buy from Jews!). Hence, for any German government to stand up and declare: “Don’t buy from Jews,” even if the proposal is limited to the Jews of Judea and Samaria, is downright chilling and should send a shiver down everyone’s spine.

No one is suggesting that Berlin is planning a second Holocaust, but there is no escaping the painful historical irony here.

And speaking of history, it was on this day [June 12] in 1987 that a very different US president than our current example uttered the words, “Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!”

Read it all.

PJM commenter Art Chance warns of the tools of stealth totalitarianism:

I used to have a sign over my desk that said: “When the enemy is in range, so are you.” In keeping with that maxim I’ve had lots of conversations with bright young lads and lasses recently appointed to high office about what the other guys could do with that pretty new toy they wanted. This was my great fear about the Patriot Act; what would the Democrats do with it? There is no such thing as a moderate Democrat under the age of 50 or so at the leadership or candidate level. In the solidly Blue places they are openly outright communists though they prefer to be called Progressives. You have to be in your sixties or older now to remember when the open communists referred to their fellow travellers and assets who were in positions where they couldn’t be open communists as “progressive” people. In the less solidly Blue places, Democrat operatives and candidates have become really really good at “passing,” as the Black folk used to call it. Comrade Obama is a graphic example of “passing.” Instead of its oldtime use in describing a light-skinned Negro who could pass for a Caucasian and live in White society, in “post-racial” America, Comrade Obama is a communist apparatchik who can pass as a moderate Democrat. He can pass so well that in addition to having a large number of ordinary citizens fooled, he’s still got one Helluva lot of Republican leaders and officeholders fooled.

I’ve done lots of investigations, taken lots of disciplinary or dismissal actions, and made quite a few referrals for prosecution of government employees for their misuse/abuse of government data and information technologies. I could literally look over someone’s shoulder and capture every image and keystroke on the internet and in email. We were once doing a serious investigation of some bad acts involving a union paid agent, a couple of executive board members, and a group of stewards. We were reading all their email, monitoring all their phone contacts, though not the content, and monitoring and often screen capturing all their internet activity on government devices. The funny part was they were often conversing about how the government was probably reading or watching what they were doing but they did it anyway.

I can tell you with absolute certainty that when you put human beings in front of computers with access to confidential or classified information, some significant percentage of them will access that data and sell it, use it against someone, or use it to coerce someone. Where the Patriot Act’s provisions have placed us is putting us in the position of having to rely solely on the good intentions of the government, something I reject in any administration but especially in a Democrat administration, or on the courts remaining honest arbiters of truth and law, something they haven’t been at the trial court level in a very long time or even at the appellate level in the Blue places.

I actually agree with Mr. McCarthy about the government’s powers here and their utility for National defense, but we have two wars going on; one is the war against the US being conducted by foreign powers outside the US, the other is the war against the US as we know it by powers operating inside the US. I always had a lot more trust in the guy I knew was my enemy than in the guy I should be able to trust but wasn’t quite sure. I know that the Soros Junta and Comrade Obama’s Administration are my enemies. Unfortunately, all too many Americans still think they should be able to trust them.

Glenn Beck interview: Not a Jew alive if Hitler had Obama’s tech

‘We will be remembered as the most evil nation in history of the world’

As reports continue to flood in about President Obama’s massive surveillance state, media powerhouse Glenn Beck says, “There wouldn’t be a Jew alive on the planet today if Hitler had this technology.”

Beck made the statement Friday on his radio program while interviewing NSA whistleblower William Binney

Binney worked at the National Security Agency for nearly four decades, and said the secret surveillance of Americans began in October 2001.

He believes the NSA is storing information on 3 billion phone calls every day.

“I’m telling you, America,” Beck cautioned, “If we don’t stop this right now, we will be remembered as the most evil nation in history of the world. We will dwarf what Germany did. And I’d say that if Mitt Romney were in office and this were happening. I would be saying exactly the same thing.”

Beck continued: “This is the way totalitarian states are created, This is it. And as much as you want to say, ‘Aw, well, that’s hogwash.’ Well, what were they doing with the IRS? And the IRS is in charge of all of your health-care information next year. Don’t you put these puzzle pieces together? They’re in charge of your health care. ‘OK, well they’re not gonna do anything.’ Really? They already are! You wanna shut down the tea party? They can do it overnight. You wanna scoop up everybody who has ever been a part of the tea party, ever visited any website. … All they have to do is put the connections in, hit print, round them up.”

“There wouldn’t be a Jew alive on the planet today if Hitler had this technology,” he concluded. “Not a Jew alive on the planet. Not one.”

More here.

{ 5 comments }