Entries Tagged 'Cheney' ↓

Hankering to go after some bad guys?

So are we!

Jawa Report: New YouTube Smackdown Assignments

Jawas have been asked to lend a hand flagging youtubes for this weeks smackdown. After all the help we’ve gotten from Quoth the Raven, we cannot refuse. Get to flagging and emailing boys and girls. Special attention goes to #1 and #3 smackdowns.

Also see the sister site below, it is dedicated to fighting the Juba series.

http://stop-internet-terrorists.blogspot.com/

FAQ

“What’s the quickest way to get started?”

  • Click on this link. It will take you to the instruction page:
    YouTube Smackdown - How-To Guide
  • The jihadist videos on January’s smackdown list are in the right sidebar, under the header SMACKDOWN Jan. 2008.
  • You will have to sign up for a YouTube ID if you don’t already have one.

“How can I put this badge on my blog?”

  • Right-click on the badge image above.
  • Save the image as 2smackj.jpg on your computer.
  • Upload the image file to a directory on your host.
  • On your blog, create a link to this URL:

http://muninn-quotheraven.blogspot.com/2007/07/youtube-smackdown-how-to-guide.html

  • In place of the anchor text, insert the link to the image file that you have uploaded on your host.
  • Example:

“But I thought 1389 Blog is opposed to censorship!”

  • Yes, we work to uphold (or restore) the U.S. Constitutional protections for speech, press, assembly, and petition, and to uphold (or restore) similar protections in other parts of the world.
  • At the same time, we are at war, and we are entirely in favor of taking down enemy propaganda and other communications. These include, but are not limited to, terrorist training and recruitment videos. Such communications are not covered by any Constitutional or other legal protections for free speech. We want them taken down entirely, not merely blocked by censorware!
  • Our jihadist enemies do not lack for computer savvy. They are constantly attempting to game the system in various ways, so as to interfere with access to legitimate, constructive political speech in the US, the EU, and other parts of the world - particularly counterterrorist and antijihadist speech - often under the guise of “political correctness.” At the same time, they abuse the system - sometimes by hacking, spamming, or vandalizing our websites and blogs - to get their own messages out at our expense!
  • The bottom line: We must reclaim control over our own avenues of communication.

“How is the campaign doing so far?

“Where can I get some more information?”


Digging Negativism

By Orlando

Are Diggers informative, negative, or positive? I wanted to know so I took a recently popular article with the criteria that it must have over 1,000 diggs. My goal was to analyze it using some very powerful text analysis software, SPSS for Text Analysis. I used this article:

VP Cheney, while CEO of Halliburton, was a client of the escort service…

Here’s what I found: 76% of the words used in posts were negative such as impeach, criminal, burn, evil, and so forth. Only 24% used positive words such as excellent, positive, better, and so forth. It was obvious that Diggers are a negative bunch by about 3 to 1. Many diggers could learn from the words of George Washington:

The foolish and wicked practice of profane cursing and swearing is a vice so mean and low that every person of sense and character detests and despises it.

Technorati tags:







Why do Diggers hate so much?

By Orlando

Today’s front page political news on Digg has multiple stories lambasting Bush, Cheney, Republicans, Lott, Giuliani, Rove, and any other deemed Conservative by the Digger elitist. The liberal elite who argue that Fox News is “unfair and unbalanced” are the first to throw fairness and balance out the window. But have you ever wondered why they hate so much? Consider the comments in those posts. They speak of “murdering idiots,” “Bush’s daily ass f***ing,” and the denigration goes on and on and on. It is an endless diatribe of insults and, yes, violence. Rarely are the posts thoughtful or supported with facts. They are just petulant.We can find the answer in some research done by Dr. Evan R. Harrington. In his work titled, The Social Psychology of Hatred, he points us to three reason for group hatred to help explain the vitriolic language of liberal Diggers.

The first approach may be thought of as a general model of social influence…The second approach might be termed an interpersonal attitude approach, in the sense that individuals are measured in the degree to which they hold attitudes corresponding to authoritarianism and social dominance, which in turn relate to social hostility and prejudice…The third approach focuses on social cognition or the way in which humans perceive the social world in a biased manner due to limits on the brain’s information processing capacity.

Let me interpret that in laymen’s terms for our liberal friends:

  1. You follow like lemmings;

  2. You have a bad attitude;

  3. You are dumb.

So now we know. How sad they have come to the point that their social status is dependent on posting some diatribe about Bush et al. that few in society will ever notice or care about. Next time you see those hate-filled posts, just understand they are sadly lost. Those liberal haters on Digg are to be pitied.

Johann Wolfgang von Goethe says it best: “Hatred is something peculiar. You will always find it strongest and most violent where there is the lowest degree of culture.”


Technorati : , , , , , , , , ,
Del.icio.us : , , , , , , , , ,
Ice Rocket : , , , , , , , , ,

Powered by Zoundry