Four Arabic words every Infidel must know

by 1389 on June 23, 2013

in 1389 (blog admin), jihad, Qur'an, taqiyya

Truthsite has the story:

In 539 BC, King Belshazzar of Babylon saw a dismembered hand-written four prophetic words on the wall. This “handwriting on the wall” was finally interpreted by the prophet Daniel as predicting the fall of the kingdom. He was right. Babylon fell to the Medes-Persians that very night.

Like the “handwriting on the wall” that Prophet Daniel had interpreted, there are four Arabic words, which could lead to submission of the entire world to Islam, if non-Muslims do not fully understand their meaning and implications. Those words are taqiyya, tawriya, kitman and muruna.

Each of these words describes a different style of deception used by Muslims when discussing Islam or their activities as Muslims.

Mohammed famously said, “War is deceit.” (Sahih Bukhari, Vol. 4, Book 52, Nr.268). The Quran boasts that Allah is the “master of all scheming” (Quran 13:42) and that he is “profound in his machinations” (Quran 8:30). Western civilizations are not accustomed to dealing with people, who have developed deception into an art form. Knowledge is power, and the best way to combat the Islamist agenda is to say, “We are used to your lying. Knock it off!”

Taqiyya

Taqiyya

Taqiyya is defined as dissimulation about ones Muslim identity. It comes from the verse in the Quran that says, “Let believers not make friends with infidels in preference to the faithful – he that does has nothing to hope for from Allah – except in self-defense (illaan tattaqoo minhum tuqatan (Quran 3:28).

This “self-defense” justifies dissimulation.Islamic Sharia Law provides, “When it is possible to achieve an aim by lying but not by telling the truth, it is permissible to lie if attaining the goal is permissible, and lying is obligatory if the goal is obligatory.”

Reliance of the Traveller. Section r8.2 PERMISSIBLE LYING. The Prophet said: “He who settles disagreements between people to bring about good or says something commendable is not a liar”). Examples include lying to protect Islam or a Muslim.

Tawriya

Tawriya

Tawriya is defined as concealing, and it could be called “creative lying” or where appropriate “lying under oath”. It is OK to break the intent of the oath, as long as you don’t break the letter of the oath.

Reliance of the Traveller. Section o19.1 If one swears “I will not eat this wheat,” but then makes it into flour or bread (and eats it), one has not broken one’s oath.

Reliance of the Traveller. Section o19.5 When a person swearing an oath about something (in the future, affirming or denying that it will occur) includes the expression “in sha’ Allah (“if Allah will”), before finishing the oath, then the oath is not broken in any event if he thereby intends to provide for exceptions.

How does this work? Suppose someone protests that Surah 1 of the Quran demeans Christians and Jews, because it is a supplication Muslims make to Allah seventeen times a day to keep them from the path of“those with whom God is angry” and “those who have lost their way”.

A Muslim might respond, “Surah 1 never mentions Jews or Christians.” He is practicing tawriya, because while Surah 1 does not mention Jews and Christians by name, but he knows full-well that the words “those” refer to Jews and Christians.

Another example would be when a Muslim responds to your greeting of “Merry Christmas!” He might say, “I wish you the best.” In your mind,you think he has returned a Christmas greeting. In actuality, he has expressed his wish for you to convert to Islam; he wishes the best for you which, in his view, is becoming a Muslim.

Kitman

Kitman

Kitman is characterized by someone telling only part of the truth. The most common example of this is when a Muslim says that jihad really refers to an internal, spiritual struggle. He is not telling “the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth”, as witnesses are sworn to do in U.S. courts.

Often, kitman results in a gross distortion of the truth. In the example given, the Quran uses jihad and its derivatives 59 times. Of those, only 16 (27%) could be considered “internal” with no object as the target of the struggle based on the context of the surah.

Another common form of kitman is to quote only the few peaceful passages from the Quran, knowing full-well that that passage was later abrogated by a more militant,contradictory verse.

Here is an example: “There is no compulsion in religion” (Quran 2:256)

“Are they seeking a religion other than Allah’s, when every soul in the heavens and earth has submitted to Him, willingly or by compulsion?”(Quran 3:83)

Another example:Permission to take up arms is hereby given to those who are attacked, because they have been wronged.” (Quran 22:39)

When the sacred months are over, slay the idolaters wherever you find them. Arrest them, besiege them and lie in ambush everywhere for them.” (Quran 9:5)

And another example: „Anyone who kills a human being… it shall be as though he has killed all mankind. …If anyone saves a life, it shall be as though he has saved the lives of all mankind…“ (Quran 5:32)

„The punishment of those who wage war against Allah… that they should bemurdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned;“ (Quran 5:33)

Muruna

Hillary and Huma

Muruna means using “flexibility” to blend in with the enemy or the surroundings. The justification for this kind of deception is a somewhat bizarre interpretation of Quran 2:106, which says, “If we abrogate a verse or cause it to be forgotten, We will replace it by abetter one or similar.”

Thus, Muslims may forget some of the commands in the Quran, as long as they are pursuing a better command. Muslims striving to advance Islam, therefore, can deviate from their Islamic laws in order to cause non-Muslims to lower their guard and place their trust in their Muslim counterpart.

At times, Muslims practice muruna in the same way a chameleon changes colors to avoid detection. Muslims will sometimes shave off their beards, wear western clothing, or even drink alcohol to blend in with non-Muslims. Nothing is more valuable these days to the Islamists than a blue-eyed Caucasian Muslim willing to engage in terrorism.

Another common way of using muruna is for a Muslim to marry a non-Muslim or to behave like a non-Muslim so their true agenda will not be suspected.

The 9/11 hijackers visited strip clubs and bars during their off-times while taking classes in the U.S. to fly airplanes into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon,and the White House. Many Americans believe Hillary Clinton’s aide, Huma Abedin, married Jewish Congressman Anthony Weiner at least in part to burnish her security credentials so she could infiltrate the highest levels of the Administration.

The implications of these highly-honed tactics of deception could be enormous for unassuming Western societies. Twenty years ago, psychologist Paul Ekman wrote an insightful book, “Telling Lies”, which demonstrated that people give off recognizable clues when they are practicing deceit. Their consciences cause them, involuntarily,to sweat or raise their voices or make other recognizable gestures.

However, Dr. Ekman’s research was exclusively with people from Western cultures. Muslims, on the other hand, show no discernible signs when they are being deceitful because there is no feeling of guilt. In their minds they are doing exactly what Allah wants them to do to advance Islam. Because any Western person who has raised children knows almost intuitively when someone is lying, so they assume they can do that in all cases. Unfortunately, those same Western people can be easily duped by Islamic deceit because there are no tell-tale signs in the deceiver.

Mosab Hassan Yousef
Mosab Hassan Yousef

Another example of playing muruna till perfection is Mosab Hassan Yousef, the „Son of Hamas“.

Mosab Hassan Yousef, the son of a jailed Hamas terrorist leader and MP, Sheikh Hassan Yousef, the most popular figure in that extremist Islamic organization. Mosab, as a young man, assisted his father for years in his political activities.

He converted to Christianity and operated under cover in the service of Israel’s intelligence agency for a decade. Yousef reveals this information in his book, Son of Hamas: A Gripping Account of Terror, Betrayal, Political Intrigue, and Unthinkable Choices. Mosab however, did not convert to what the West would recognize as Christianity, but to a fiery, Palestinian brand of the faith that is vehemently anti-Israel. According to Mosab, his main goal in coming to the U.S.is to infiltrate the main source of international support for Israel: the American church. From an interview with Al-Arabiya:

“During my tours in universities and even churches, [I found] the real support for Israel stems from the church in the West….. We need to understand the difference between “revenge” and “resistance” and once the Palestinians do, we will have our victory against Israel.”

Hopefully, this article will be a wake-up call to the unsuspecting infidels. Trust but verify – as was an old American strategy in dealing with potentially hostile parties – is the way to go in dealing with Islamists.

Ref.:
Louis Palme
Pamela Geller

{ 11 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Zenster June 23, 2013 at 8:36 pm

Trust but verify – as was an old American strategy in dealing with potentially hostile parties – is the way to go in dealing with Islamists.

In actuality, this is a total fallacy. There is no practical way to “verify” anything about the internal beliefs of a Muslim. As the article itself notes:

“Muslims, on the other hand, show no discernible signs when they are being deceitful because there is no feeling of guilt.

There is no remedy or resort that can successfully cope with this degree of incorrigible deception. Separation from and isolation of Muslims is the only workable protection from such habitual treachery.

Simply put, taqiyya—along with all other forms of doctrinally absolved Muslim deceit—irrevocably damns Islam. There is no possible way that any Muslim can be trusted, ever. Short of regularly administering prohibitively expensive fMRI (functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging) tests—one of the only infallible lie detection methods—to every Muslim in the West, there will never be any reliable way of assuring that subversive domestic terrorism isn’t being carried out. Even routine fMRI tests would not be able to catch cases of SJS (Sudden Jihad Syndrome) and the death tolls of those attacks alone are intolerable.

Islam and the West are immiscible. No reconciliation can be obtained, not ever. There is no conceivable way that these two entities can coexist, regardless of what the naive or uninformed would prefer to believe. While some may claim that IKAGO (I Know A Good One), such examples of integrated Muslims are like a tame piranha fish, deceptive at best and potentially lethal to the unsuspecting. Those who think that any assimilation of Muslims in the West is possible should be forced to spend a few years residing in some Islamic hellhole as an object lesson.

2 1389 June 23, 2013 at 9:48 pm

@Zenster,

It’s always good to hear from you.

Your comment is spot on and deserves to be posted as an article on its own.

3 Dr.Music June 25, 2013 at 4:23 pm

The ideological destruction of Islam is the greatest HUMAN RIGHTS IMPERATIVE in the history of mankind. Never before has a single totalitarian ideology so impacted the entire population of the planet – 5 billion non-Muslims terrorized by Mu-ham-mad’s Jihad, and 1.5 billion Muslims enslaved by Mu-ham-mads violent ideology of submission.

The ideological destruction of Islam will free 5 billion non-Muslim ‘INFIDELS’ from the fear of Mu-ham-mad’s Jihad, and will liberate 1.5 billion Muslims from Mu-ham-mad’s oppressive yoke of submission.
ISLAM MUST BE DESTROYED!!!
HOW WILL YOU CONTRIBUTE ?

A “phobia” is an irrational fear. Thus, “homophobia” is an irrational fear of homosexuality.
Which, of course, is silly on several levels. BLOOD CULTOPHOBIA REFERS TO AN IRRATIONAL FEAR.
BUT FEAR OF ISLAM IS TOTALLY RATIONAL.
SO THE TERM BLOOD CULTOPHOBIA IS NOT SILLY, BUT IT IS MISLEADING, IN A HAZARDOUS WAY.

In an interview with the washington post’s sally quinn, daisy khan lamented: “when will muslims be accepted as plain old americans?” teacher please let me answer daisy khan’s question..please please please .. Thank you .. Daisy..the answer to your question is ..never ! Never ! Never !.. Muslims will never be accepted as plain old americans or australians or british or dutch or indian or or any other country’s cool people .. Why ? Because blood always flows where muslims go.. In this day and age too and right from the time Islam was cooked up to be choked down people’s throats by hook or by crook.. Mostly crooked. Have you read the koran daisy khan ? You look like an educated lady but are you really ? Logic is the corner stone of education. Education does not mean recitation. Recitation is the literal translation of the word koran. Education means logical thinking for self. What do you daisy khan see in the koran which all of us also have read and are reading and logically dustbining ? Where do you see logic in the koran ? You daisy khan are scared of admitting the koran is nonsense because it sanctions your murder if you question it . You are petrified to leave Islam daisy khan . You are scared for your life so you argue for it . Were you born in Islam daisy khan or did you fall into it ? Being born into Islam is just very bad karma but to be educated and factually read about your miserable and horrible leader and yet stay in Islam is an insult to your intelligence. Islam has an agenda of hate. Show me one good verse about any ..absolutely any other faith in your evil Blood Cultic texts and we’ll stop right here. Half sentences do not count like peace on earth which is half the sentence of peace on earth when the whole world is muslim. These half sentences are lies. Daisy khan you do know what lies are don’t you ? Daisy khan why don’t you get out of the cult of Islam and try some other lifestyle like peaceful hinduism and buddhism or be an atheist ? If you do leave Islam daisy khan please rest assured that your paranoid and 1400 years dead leader is not going to come after you with a cleaver and even if he did just about any cop on any street in this beautiful wide Blood Cult-free world would just shoot him dead in his tracks and save you . You know why daisy khan your mo boy would have to be shot ? Because your mo boy is a classic case of a mad man . Certified stupid and evil to the core. You can’t make evil this bad up. Your mo-boy was pure evil. And his even eviler invention alahh. A 1400 year old filthy imagination still feeding simple desert people to become mad. . Endangering evry non muslim life in today’s complex societies all over the planet . We can’t have a decent meal or hour long lazy chats without the evil of/from mecca creeping in and spoiling the moment. Daisy khan why don’t you get your rauf boy out of Islam too ? Why not ? Would he k i l l you even for thinking that ? Why ? I’ll tell you .because it’s written in the dirty koran. That’s why !!!
Tell the world some more lies daisy khan.. Tell the world some more lies..

”the refusal of the western elite class to protect their nations from jihadist infiltration is the biggest betrayal in history.”

4 InvictusLux August 28, 2013 at 10:28 am

The problem with a “holy book” that proscribes deception as an “ends justifies the means” modus operandi is that this should, to a rational mind, immediately bring into doubt the source credibility itself. To the critical thinker the very first thought after reading these passages should be “is the Koran itself using deception in its formulations to beguile and test our faith”? Once license is given to deceive and one buys into it as morally just (against all reason) then one has essentially given permission to the “author” (whoever that may be) to deceive you as well – even as to authorship.

Jesus taught that Satan (the devil) is the Father of All Lies and that vice along with pride/hubris/narcissism are the principal means of discerning his signature. Its an impossible contradiction for God, a supreme entity of Truth to ever utter a falsehood. It just does not follow from reason or from any theological or logical principal. Absolute truth can not participate in deception. Ergo, the Koran can’t be Divinely Inspired in whole. I would concede the rational sections that were stolen or plagiarized by the real author of the Koran ( a mere scribe who never knew the man called “Muhammad”) are only rational because they came from a real pedigree in part (i.e. the widely available Pentateuch of the Jews).

What a mess we have….

5 Jeff July 29, 2014 at 6:59 pm

This entire site is a type of “Christian Zionist” liars propaganda. What taqiyya , tawiya, kitman, etc, really means is this: When a Muslims family is surrounded by insane people like on this page, coming to kill them because they worship God, instead of “Jesus”, or for not being an atheist or a polytheist worshiping fathers & sons & Mothers of God & Holy Ghosts, etc.. THEN YES- A MUSLIM IS ALLOWED TO, AS A MEANS OF SAVING HIS SELF, HER FAMILY , AS A MEANS OF DEFENSE FROM HARM, OF COURSE THEY WOULD BE ALLOWED TO SAY SOMETHING LIKE, “Muhammad and Allah are just crazy things from THE DEVIL! We are scientists who are Jewish Christians that are just like PAMELA GELLER, WOULD YOU LIKE SOME VODKA !!!! (you kafars are all sick-whomever wrote the above article is practicing exactly what they are bitching about.) May “God” reward you as you should be, and I wouldn’t want to see that.

6 1389 July 29, 2014 at 10:08 pm

@ Jeff,

Islam is built on hatred against Christians and Jews. Without us, you would have nothing to define yourself against.

7 Jeff July 29, 2014 at 10:43 pm

That diatribe makes no logical statement of fact. My point stands and nothing you said disputes that. In fact it only proves my point. In fact the misnomer “Christian” did not come into use until about the 13th century when the Greeks politisized and propagandized the “Ingeel” or “New Testament”, to TRY to counter the fictitious Babylonian Talmud and the Quran.

8 1389 July 30, 2014 at 10:33 am

@ Jeff,

WRONG.

“And it came about that for an entire year they met with the church, and taught considerable numbers; and the disciples were first called Christians at Antioch.” (Acts 11:23-26).

9 Jeff July 31, 2014 at 2:18 am

Again you prove my Point. Read Acts in its original form and”Christian” is not used- as proof, in the Latin text it ends with, ” primus disciplenium al Nazrium et Antiococus” not-“first called Christians at Antioch.” And if you care to go back further to the Hebrew/Aramaic it only uses the term, when translated, that means’ the students and followers of Isa (Latin = Isus) ben Maryam.

10 1389 July 31, 2014 at 10:22 pm

@ Jeff,

You sure are good at twisting words around. Christ was and is the Nazarene.

This discussion is at an end.

Blog admin 1389

11 Greg Belcher December 16, 2014 at 8:25 am

There’s a more important word you missed – “nasakha” (abrogation). It deals with mohammed’s sacred writings and simply says the NEW replace the OLD. So his ‘peace’ is replaced by his ‘the sword’ (force): forced conquest, conversion, slavery, sex slavery, and murder. Look it up!

Leave a Comment

{ 3 trackbacks }

Previous post:

Next post: