Jihadis get visas to enter Australia; their opponents, not so much

by Gramfan on September 18, 2012

in Australia, Geert Wilders, Gramfan (team member), Hizb ut-Tahrir, taqiyya

Dhimmitude on steroids!

Andrew Bolt: Islamists may enter; their opponents maybe not

A Dutch political leader who warns against Islamic radicalism has trouble getting permission to come here, but an Islamic hate preacher is waved through. Something here is very wrong:

Geert Wilders
Geert Wilders

Supporters of controversial anti-Islam campaigner Geert Wilders fear he may be refused entry to Australia ahead of his planned speaking tour next month.

The right-wing Dutch MP has applied for a visa to come and give speeches in Sydney and Melbourne, but the application has stalled…

Mr Wilders has a reputation the world over as a fierce opponent of Islam. He has compared the Koran to Hitler’s Mein Kampf, called Islam an ideology not a religion, and called the Prophet Mohammed a paedophile among other insults…

The reason (for the delay) is that the Dutch politician is on the Movement Alert List, a database of people of concern to Australia. It means his application is held up at the Department of Immigration headquarters in Canberra while more thorough checks are done.

He is on the list because of his previous brushes with authorities abroad. In 2009 he was refused entry to the UK but later appealed and won. He was also tried and acquitted in the Netherlands on hate charges over his controversial public comments.

Meanwhile, though:

The decision for the (Immigration) minister comes after he approved a visa for Taji Mustafa, the British head of Islamist group Hizb Ut-Tahrir.

Mr Mustafa, though, is not on the Movement Alert List.

Incredible. Here is some of Hizb Ut-Tahrir’s latest press release, endorsing the recent protests against some YouTube clip:

The US Ambassdor to Australia, Jeffrey Bleich, claims that his ‘homeland’ has been unfairly targeted by ‘Muslim extremism’ in the wake of the film. Australian officials too have expressed surprise at why the United States is the target of Muslim anger. We remind him and them that the US administration has a long record of exploitative interference in the Muslim World. From drone strikes in Pakistan, to soldiers burning copies of the Quran in Afghanistan, to torture by rendition, to Guantanamo Bay, Abu Ghraib, and Baghram airbase. The list is as long as it is ugly. So do not feign surprise….

The large-scale and praiseworthy reaction from Muslims globally to the insulting film is not about the film alone. The film is merely a trigger and the latest manifestation of a persistent Western attack against Islam and Muslims. An attack defined by the likes of the unjust and savage invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, the Danish Cartoons, decades of Western support for dictators in the Muslims, decades of economic and political subjation of Muslim lands, and decades of preventing the Muslim World from assuming its own political destiny…

With respect to the protest in Sydney on Saturday 15/09/12, Hizb ut-Tahrir Australia had nothing to do with its organisation or execution. We do not condone violent protest. However, we affirm that primary responsibility for what occurred lies squarely on the powerful institutions of society – media and the political establishment in particular – which continually attack Islam and Muslims, creating the grievances that give rise to such incidents, isolating youth, and causing social tension.

Oh, and by the way, we at 1389 Blog do not believe Hizb ut-Tahrir’s official disclaimer of responsibility for the Sydney riots. That’s nothing but taqiyya!

More here:


{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }

1 Theo Prinse September 23, 2012 at 6:42 pm

I trust the Australian officials will generously issue a visa for mr. Geert Wilders.

Holland and Australia goes way back with captain Willem Janszoon landing in 1606 on Australia’s beaches as the first European to do so with the Duyfken

As a Dutchmen I witnessed the intellectual fight of Ayaan Hirsi Ali (now living in Washington American Enterprise Institute) in Dutch Parliament siting next to Geert Wilders in the seats held by the liberal party the VVD (For Freedom and Democracy) Geert Wilders was ousted from that party in August 2004 and he and Ali were threatened in November 2004 in a letter stabbed in the murdered body of Dutch film maker Theo van Gogh (nephew of Vincent van Gogh) by Morrocan Jihadi Bouyeri which urged both of them to be protected immediately by the Dutch State.

Geert Wilders lives a terrible life since behind protective glass, guards, safe houses etc. etc. and leads his new party – the Freedom Party, PVV (Party for Freedom) …

Meanwhile Ayaan Hirsi Ali remained in the VVD until she was ousted from the Netherlands to the US by fascist attacks of low educated vulgar reactionaries under the professional lead of the left wing socialist elite. who control the entire Dutch television media.

Ayaan Hirsi Ali defended Freedom of Speech after the world wide Muslim riots as she has always done back in 2001 – 2004 and which position has been unassailably the position of the current Prime Minister of the Netherlands Mark Rutte was a party colleague of Ali and Geert Wilders.

Ayaan Hirsi Ali – like New York based Pamela Geller (Atlas Shrugs) – defends precisely the Freedom of Speech in the context of Speech being the primal instrument of truth …
Once Freedom of Speech even in the slightest measure is reduced .. it is dead.

The main argument of Muslims assuming feelings of pain for critique on their prophet in video’s is merely pain in the assuming fantasy of the Muslim.

Other than physical hurt no real pain is caused by saying something because whatever critique that has been said is nothing more than molecules bouncing on the Muslims eardrum.

So the ‘pain’ is not caused by the physical aspect of the critique expressed … but what a random Muslim projects his own prejudice in it.

The pain alleged in critique against the prophet is caused by the Muslim himself.

The Muslim should either punish himself or shut up.

Having said this it is true that the Islam is not a Abrahamic religion but a military terrorist doctrine under the guise of a conventional religion.
Left wing liberation religion communist circles within the Christian International community have accepted this false notion of Islam being a peaceful religion and deny Islam in reality to be a murderous terrorist ideology with the majority of the naief Muslims totally unaware …

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: