No Rabat at Ground Zero!

by 1389 on September 18, 2011

in 1389 (blog admin), history of jihad, India, jihad, NYC, September 11, 2001

Warns MsBlue at Blazing Cat Fur:

As a hindu, I laugh at the naivety of the left who think the ground zero mosque is not a victory mosque. here is a link about the thousands of victory mosques in india, built over the destroyed remains of hindu temples.

By Sita Ram Goel [et. al.]:
Hindu Temples: What Happened to Them

Islam center’s eerie echo of ancient terror

Should there be a mosque near Ground Zero? In fact, what is proposed is not a mosque — nor even an “Islamic cultural center.”

In Islam, every structure linked to the faith and its rituals has a precise function and character. A mosque is a one-story gallery built around an atrium with a mihrab (a niche pointing to Mecca) and one, or in the case of Shiites two, minarets.

Other Islamic structures, such as harams, zawiyyahs, husseinyiahs and takiyahs, also obey strict architectural rules. Yet the building used for spreading the faith is known as Dar al-Tabligh, or House of Proselytizing.

This 13-story multifunctional structure couldn’t be any of the above.

The groups fighting for the project know this; this is why they sometimes call it an Islamic cultural center. But there is no such thing as an Islamic culture.

Islam is a religion, not a culture. Each of the 57 Muslim-majority nations has its own distinct culture — and the Bengali culture has little in common with the Nigerian. Then, too, most of those countries have their own cultural offices in the US, especially in New York.

Islam is an ingredient in dozens of cultures, not a culture on its own.

In theory, at least, the culture of American Muslims should be American. Of course, this being America, each ethnic community has its distinct cultural memories — the Iranians in Los Angeles are different from the Arabs in Dearborn.

In fact, the proposed structure is known in Islamic history as a rabat — literally a connector. The first rabat appeared at the time of the Prophet.

The Prophet imposed his rule on parts of Arabia through a series of ghazvas, or razzias (the origin of the English word “raid”). The ghazva was designed to terrorize the infidels, convince them that their civilization was doomed and force them to submit to Islamic rule. Those who participated in the ghazva were known as the ghazis, or raiders.

After each ghazva, the Prophet ordered the creation of a rabat — or a point of contact at the heart of the infidel territory raided. The rabat consisted of an area for prayer, a section for the raiders to eat and rest and facilities to train and prepare for future razzias. Later Muslim rulers used the tactic of ghazva to conquer territory in the Persian and Byzantine empires. After each raid, they built a rabat to prepare for the next razzia.

It is no coincidence that Islamists routinely use the term ghazva to describe the 9/11 attacks against New York and Washington. The terrorists who carried out the attack are referred to as ghazis or shahids (martyrs).

Thus, building a rabat close to Ground Zero would be in accordance with a tradition started by the Prophet. To all those who believe and hope that the 9/11 ghazva would lead to the destruction of the American “Great Satan,” this would be of great symbolic value.

More here.

 


{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }

1 Zenster September 18, 2011 at 6:54 pm

That there is even any debate over erection of a ghazva at Ground Zero goes the heart of this country’s fundamental disconnect with respect to linking the 9-11 atrocity with Islam.

Continued used of the terms “radical” and fundamentalist” when discussing Islam are prime indicators that few, if any, understand how Islam comes in only one essential and very violent flavor.

The inability of people to realize this amounts to the will not to believe. It presages terrorist attacks on a scale that will dwarf the 9-11 atrocity and, quite possibly, trigger the Muslim holocaust. This is where Liberalism and Multiculturalism bear direct responsibility for the magnitude of the butcher’s bill that awaits.

That aside, none of this would be necessary were it not for Islam itself and the global Muslim community will soon learn that their thundering silence over the 9-11 atrocity and terrorism in general began the sounding of Islam’s death knell.

Nature abhors a vacuum and into Islam’s deafening silence there has begun to reverberate the tolling that shall signify its passing.

As an after note, it would not surprise me in the least if the building of a ghazva at Ground Zero inspired a Breivik-style response. In fact, I could almost guarantee it.

Leave a Comment

{ 1 trackback }

Previous post:

Next post: