Just askin’…What would “Ubama” be doing differently if he actually were a Muslim?

by 1389 on May 20, 2011

in 1389 (blog admin), Is Obama a Muslim?, Islamic infiltration, Islamic terrorism, Israel, leftist-jihadist convergence, Muslim Brotherhood, Palestinians, PLO, Stupid, Crazy, AND Evil, treason

Disillusioned smiley with question mark
Just askin’…

Obama, Netanyahu Meet Amid Discord Over 1967 Borders

(h/t: huckfunn)

YouTube Preview Image

President Obama welcomed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to the White House Friday, one day after the president’s policy speech on the Arab world and Israeli-Palestinian relations called for a return to pre-1967 borders, a state Mr. Netanyahu called “indefensible.” After a closed door meeting, Netanyahu reiterated that “Israel has certain security requirements.”

If you can decipher the polite diplomatic terminology, Bibi told Ubama, in no uncertain terms, that he will not compromise Israel’s security by capitulating to any of BO’s demands, and that’s that.

Good for Bibi. Unlike BO, he loves his own country and he understands what his duties are.

Caroline Glick: Obama’s Abandonment of America

(h/t: Speranza)

I was out sick yesterday so I was unable to write today’s column for the Jerusalem Post. I did manage to watch President Obama’s speech on the Middle East yesterday evening. And I didn’t want to wait until next week to discuss it. After all, who knows what he’ll do by Tuesday?

Before we get into what the speech means for Israel, it is important to consider what it means for America.

Quite simply, Obama’s speech represents the effective renunciation of the US’s right to have and to pursue national interests. Consequently, his speech imperils the real interests that the US has in the region – first and foremost, the US’s interest in securing its national security.

Obama’s renunciation of the US national interests unfolded as follows:

First, Obama mentioned a number of core US interests in the region. In his view these are: “Countering terrorism and stopping the spread of nuclear weapons; securing the free flow of commerce, and safe-guarding the security of the region; standing up for Israel’s security and pursuing Arab-Israeli peace.”

Then he said, “Yet we must acknowledge that a strategy based solely upon the narrow pursuit of these interests will not fill an empty stomach or allow someone to speak their mind.”

While this is true enough, Obama went on to say that the Arabs have good reason to hate the US and that it is up to the US to put its national interests aside in the interest of making them like America. As he put it, “a failure to change our approach threatens a deepening spiral of division between the United States and Muslim communities.”

And you know what that means. If the US doesn’t end the “spiral of division,” (sounds sort of like “spiral of violence” doesn’t it?), then the Muslims will come after America. So the US better straighten up and fly right.

And how does it do that? Well, by courting the Muslim Brotherhood which spawned Al Qaeda, Hamas, Jamma Islamiya and a number of other terror groups and is allies with Hezbollah.
[…]
The fact is that if you don’t distinguish between your allies and your enemies then you betray your allies and side with your enemies. Bahrain and Yemen need US support to survive. Iran and Syria do not. So when he removes US support from the former, his action redounds to the direct benefit of the latter.

I hope the US Navy’s 5th Fleet has found alternate digs because Obama just opened the door for Iran to take over Bahrain. He also invited al Qaeda – which he falsely claimed is a spent force – to take over Yemen.

Beyond his abandonment of Bahrain and Yemen, in claiming that the US mustn’t distinguish between its allies and its foes, Obama made clear that he has renounced the US’s right to have and pursue national interests. If you can’t favor your allies against your enemies then you cannot defend your national interests. And if you cannot defend your national interests then you renounce your right to have them.
[…]
In short, every American who is concerned about the security of the United States should be livid. The US President just abandoned his responsibility to defend the country and its interests in the interest of coddling the US’s worst enemies.

AS FOR ISRAEL, in a way, Obama did Israel a favor by giving this speech. By abandoning even a semblance of friendliness, he has told us that we have nothing whatsoever to gain by trying to make him like us. Obama didn’t even say that he would oppose the Palestinians’ plan to get the UN Security Council to pass a resolution in support for Palestinian independence. All he said was that it is a dumb idea.

Obama sided with Hamas against Israel by acting as though its partnership with Fatah is just a little problem that has to be sorted out to reassure the paranoid Jews.
[…]
Then of course there are all the hostile, hateful details of his [Obama’s] speech:

He said Israel has to concede its right to defensible borders as a precondition for negotiations;

He didn’t say he opposes the Palestinian demand for open immigration of millions of foreign Arabs into Israel;

He again ignored Bush’s 2004 letter to Sharon opposing a return to the 1949 armistice lines, supporting the large settlements, defensible borders and opposing mass Arab immigration into Israel;

He said he was leaving Jerusalem out but actually brought it in by calling for an Israeli retreat to the 1949 lines;

He called for Israel to be cut in two when he called for the Palestinians state to be contiguous;

He called for Israel to withdraw from the Jordan Valley – without which it is powerless against invasion – by saying that the Palestinian State will have an international border with Jordan.

Conceptually and substantively, Obama abandoned the US alliance with Israel. The rest of his words – security arrangements, demilitarized Palestinian state and the rest of it – were nothing more than filler to please empty-headed liberal Jews in America so they can feel comfortable signing checks for him again.

Read it all, including the comments!

Animated smiley waving flag of Israel

Any more questions?


{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Zenster May 21, 2011 at 11:59 am

He said Israel has to concede its right to defensible borders as a precondition for negotiations

What negotiations? Anyone with even a single lonely neuron that is still firing knows how all “negotiations” with Fatah and Hamas are one-sided affairs with Israel making significant concessions in return for absolutely NOTHING.

Watch the movie “Relentless: Struggle for Peace in the Middle East”. Then come back and show what use any “negotiations” are or ever have been. Islam has demonstrated to us over and over again that its terms are non-negotiable.

The fact that there can never be any lasting peace with Muslims and only hudna, is as clear-cut an indicator of this simple fact as anyone is ever going to get.

Bravo, 1389, for so succinctly summing up my own assertion that BHO is a de facto Muslim with your own question:

“What would Ubama be doing differently if he actually were a Muslim?”

The answer seems to be a mathematical certainty: ZERO.

2 Always On Watch May 23, 2011 at 6:04 am

You know how I would answer the question that is the title of this post!

Obama is doing everything he can to further the rise of Islam. Indeed, he is promoting the rise of Islamic supremacism.

This so-called “Arab Spring” is more akin to the Iranian Revolution than to any concept that Westerners have of freedom.

As for Netanyahu, I wish that he had reached out and slapped Obama. Of course, I’m sure there is no way to knock any sense into Obama’s head. Obama has an agenda with regard to foreign policy and will not deviate from that agenda. :evil:

3 fearthesame June 13, 2011 at 8:14 pm

One could argue that his positions on social issues would be different. Although not necessarily on abortion since it helps thin the herd. I mean Planned Parenthood is the jihads greatest weapon. Look at the reproduction rates of the Western world’s Christian and Jewish populations. Compare to the Islamic one. Then there is the gay issue. Obama has become much more agressive on this issue lately. You’d think if he was Muslim, he wouldn’t wanto to overturn DOMA. THen again Muslim activists have become effective at using the PC structure designed to “protect” gays from any criticism.

Still I see no evidence that Obama believes that God takes interest in man’s affairs.

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: