Who is commenter DvDH?

Ferrous Cranus - click for original original
Flame Warriors: Ferrous Cranus – click to see full-size original

Commenter DvDH has been carrying on a heated argument with other commenters and 1389 Blog team members in the comments on several posts, including:

This is in reply to this and other comments by DvDH:

“…in a hive of evil like the kangaroo court at The Hague, and the more time and energy you have invested in it, the more difficult it becomes to shake off the indoctrination and begin to question what you were told, and what actually went …..”

“I do not allow groundless accusations on this blog, simply because it is impossible for the accused to prove a negative. The burden of proof is on YOU, the accuser,…”

Note the contradiction above…

As for your comments on Islam, I have been posted and lived in many Muslims countries and currently work/do so. I have studied Islam and observe the reality of its day to day life. I have seen its worst – 2 years in Iran, its most difficult – 2 years in Pakistan and its best – Turkey and Morocco (the latter I am now permanently based).

From the perspective academically and from the reality on the ground, I think what you say is pure garbage and since you have confessed to an agenda, not suprising.

It does not take one to be a rocket scientist to know the differnt views, interpretations, laws and behaviours from the varient 56 Muslim nations to know that your sad generalization simply falls flat.

An interesting point from you, when you talk about Greater Serbia you did not support it with anything but simply attacked Islam and rather badly from a historical and academic point as well. The Serbian lands that were conquered and controlled by the Ottomans (not Islam itself) were often well supported by the population and if one simply goes to a source that shows the pashas, military leaders and academics of the time within the area and in the Empire as a whole, many were Serbs and not converts.

Then again, you have committed yourself to an agenda and hey, just like the jihadists you constantly refer to, screw accuracy and basic tenants of logic.

A question, why did you name your blog as you did and ten refer to it as Counterjihad? The date refers to the battle which was a draw (though it wasted out the capacity of the Serbs to continue) but what suprises me is that the battle had nothing to do with a jihad as the last (and still is) jihad was in the 11th century in response to the claim of a crusade by Pope Urban II?

Filibuster - click for original
Flame Warriors: Filibuster – click to see full-size original

The stale ranting rhetoric of mega-racist DvDH is beginning to wear thin. Let ‘s review a few facts here:

  1. He admits working for the Serb-hating ICTY kangaroo court at the Hague, which was specially created to railroad the Serbs and NEVER had the slightest purpose of providing any justice. He is proud of his work for this racist organization, and consequently is a self-admitted racist.
  2. 1389 Blog has constantly provided careful documentation of all facts presented. This is nothing new; we have done it for all the years that we have been in existence. Why should anyone pay attention to a loud-mouth Dutch racist like DvDH?
  3. DvDH is either the hypocrite of all hypocrites or lacks the brainpower to understand that Geert Wilders is about as far from being a Nazi as the east is from the west, and that the false prophet Mohammad was the epitome of a terrorist.
  4. DvDH may well be insane. He has been shown over and over again that he is a ranting and raving Serb-hating racist, yet he posts stuff like this, “Show me a hate filled rant. I have not said that I hate, nor promote hate against Serbs.” How many time do we need to show him?
  5. DvDH has gone so far as to deny George Soros’ involvement with the ICTY kangaroo court. No one is so dumb or naïve as to believe that one. Soros provided funding and faked evidence for the ICTY. Is someone paying DvDH to write comments attacking the Serbs, attacking 1389 Blog for defending the Serbs, and whitewashing the ICTY? Courts such as the ICTY, and the Benelux countries that host them, are acting as whores — taking money from any person, organization, or government who will pay to prosecute their enemies.
  6. DvDH admits to assisting the enemies of the Serbian people in fabricating the hoax of the Srebrenica “massacre.” The paleo-Nazis (1933-1945) did such things, blaming Czechs, Jews and . . . yes . . . even Serbs for doing evil things, so as to provide an excuse to do evil to those peoples being blamed. This, by his own admission, makes him the modern equivalent of Nazi propagandists from that era.
  7. DvDH admits to having lived in multiple Muslim countries. Perhaps he may fear that the Muslims will cut his head off if he doesn’t continue to post this kind of nonsense in cyberspace. For all we know, there may even be a possibility that Muslims are holding members of his family hostage. The likeliest scenario is that DvDH has been so brainwashed that he can no longer think straight. Of course, he may be actually be a Muslim. If he is a Muslim, he will feel the need to lie to promote Islam. This is called taqiyya. He will even know where in the Koran it tells him to do so.
  8. DvDH claims that his French is better than his English. That is good because he English really sucks. I was tempted to tell him to stick to French-language blogs where he might not sound so stupid. But, I would not wish that on the poor French, as I am not a racist like DvDH.
  9. DvDH uses the word “logic.” Please, DvDH, don’t use words that you are incapable of understanding. I have read a lot of what you have posted and you do not understand the English word “logic.” If fact, I don’t think you are capable of understand the word “logic.” You simply seem to lack the equipment to ever understand the meaning of that big English-language word.

Garble - click for original
Flame Warriors: Garble – click to see full-size original

On a more pleasant note, I recently saw a film about how Mossad had captured and brought Adolf Eichmann to justice some 15 years after the fall of the Nazis. Eichmann was tried and convicted in Israel. He was hanged and his body cremated. They dumped his ashes at sea, outside of Israeli territorial waters.

Perhaps the day will come when all those who persecuted the Serbs be brought to justice. Start with the world leaders who bombed them, like Clinton and Blair. Then go to those who persecuted them at the Hague. (No, I don’t mean “prosecute”; to call what they did to the Serbs at the ICTY “prosecutions” would be an insult to everyone in the criminal justice system.)

I know it will never happen, but DvDH and his ilk are the exact same type of people who worked for the Third Reich when it was in power. If the Nuremburg Trials were right and the Eichmann Trial was right, all decent human beings must renouce the atrocities committed against the Serbian people at the ICTY.

Why are we confronting DvDH?

Troller - click for original
Flame Warriors: Troller – click to see full-size original

The reason that we are continuing to confront DvDH, rather than simply deleting his comments, because he admits to having been personally involved in the ICTY (International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia) kangaroo court.

We know DvDH is not arguing in good faith. Yet it may be worthwhile to confront our enemies when they appear on this blog, rather than simply blocking them or deleting their comments. One reason why the former Soviet Union fell was that the people charged with enforcing that police state stopped believing in it themselves. when Ronald Reagan called the Soviet Union an “evil empire”, it made many people in the former Soviet Union stop and think. The deep anger of the citizens of the former Czechoslovakia at the Soviet invasion following the “Prague Spring” had a similar effect. It may take years or decades for these seeds to take root, but it is worth the effort.

That having been said, there are limits to everything, including our patience.


Also see:


{ 5 comments… read them below or add one }

1 CzechRebel March 6, 2011 at 5:50 pm

DvDH did try to weigh in with one of his typical that’s-not-fair comments. Just a groundless complaint, as always. Well, if he has something new or intelligent, we may approve it. However, DvDH has distinguished himself as a troll. If he wants to comment on the 1389 Blog, he’d better learn to behave first.

We post most everything, but some people try to push the envelope a bit too far. There are plenty of forums that deal with that nonsense. We do NOT!

2 Hesperado March 6, 2011 at 6:49 pm

Thanks Czech Rebel for doing some heavy lifting here against the guy with the annoying nickname, what is it… oh yeah, “DvDH”.

I would only add that I have yet to see any evidence, or any actual argument based on evidence (and all actual arguments must be based on evidence), from the pen of DvDH.

When we look at some of the things he has written and examine them a little more closely, what apparent substance they may have seemed to have falls apart. Thus:

Quoting 1389: “…in a hive of evil like the kangaroo court at The Hague, and the more time and energy you have invested in it, the more difficult it becomes to shake off the indoctrination and begin to question what you were told, and what actually went …..”

“I do not allow groundless accusations on this blog, simply because it is impossible for the accused to prove a negative. The burden of proof is on YOU, the accuser,…”

DvDH wrote: “Note the contradiction above…”

What is DvDH trying to say here? That because one person or movement supports the principle of free speech and fair self-defense, they cannot set reasonable limits on that? Furthermore, The Hague has far more power to punish in real life, whereas a blog simply limiting someone’s comments is hardly a horrible privation to endure. And lastly, DvDH has shown that he himself is a proponent of the same supposed contradiction of which he is accusing 1389 blog — insofar, that is, as he may be a sincere advocate of modern Western democracy as he implies (and not, perhaps, a crypto-Fascist himself, in which case, there is no contradiction).

Next, we see him trot out the tired horse (or camel) of anecdotal evidence to support the “Islam is a Wonderfully Diverse Religion And Therefore Muslims Cannot Be Pinned Down As Bad (Though We Can Always Make Broad Sweeping Statements About How Wonderful They Are And You Would Know This IF You Had Actually Traveled To Muslim Countries And Met Muslims Face-To-Face As I have” meme.

Simply put, such a meme does not provide sufficient evidence for the broad sweeping claim that most Muslims are innocuous, and that thus our dot-connecting concerns (based on thousands of dots for which DvDH lacks, as Hugh Fitzgerald once put it, “the mental pencil to connect”) are baseless.

Then DvDH takes the trouble to move his little finger in the general direction of adducing evidence — but of course, never quite arrives:

“From the perspective academically…I think what you say is pure garbage…”

Absent an actual argument based upon evidence (hence, “academically”), this is merely a hollow assertion.

“… and since you have confessed to an agenda, not suprising.”

Everyone has an agenda; including Anti-Fascist Fascists like DvDH.

“It does not take one to be a rocket scientist to know the differnt views, interpretations, laws and behaviours from the varient 56 Muslim nations to know that your sad generalization simply falls flat.”

Another hollow assertion, containing slightly more details, but still ringing hollow. The mere fact of “different views, interpretations, laws and behaviors” among the Muslims of the Islamic diaspora does not pertinently address whether those differences continue to contain and advocate the worrisome aspects of Islam, or not. One could have a wonderfully diverse global Nazi movement which could have “different views, interpretations, laws and behaviors”. Would that mean we should not be worried about that global Nazi movement?

These are all distinctions and points of logic so excruciatingly elementary, it pains to have to articulate them.

“An interesting point from you, when you talk about Greater Serbia you did not support it with anything but simply attacked Islam…”

Perhaps in that one particular article, some of the points about Serbia were left uncited, but this blog contains a veritable mountain of data substantiating every claim made about Islam, Jihad and Serbia. Just because DvDH hasn’t the time or mental energy to avail himself of that mountain, doesn’t mean it’s not there. Not that it would do any good if he took the trouble to climb it, anyway. Even following the old saying, “If Mohammed won’t go to the mountain, bring the mountain to Mohammed” would be, one expects, pointless with someone as ideologically deformed as DvDH.

“The Serbian lands that were conquered and controlled by the Ottomans (not Islam itself)…”

Huh? That’s like saying, “The German Nazis (not Nazism itself)…”

“…were often well supported by the population…”

What does “well supported by the population” mean in this regard? If he means, in his stilted Dutch-French-English way to be saying that the non-Muslim Serbs supported their Muslim pillagers, conquerors, killers, torturers, rapists, and abductors of little boys, then he should be laughed out of court, kangaroo or otherwise. Sure, there may have been a smattering of Serbs who went along with the new Islamic regime — as an abused and terrified wife may go along, out of sheer survival and cowed Stockholm Syndrome-type fear, with a violently abusive husband who sexually molests her children — as other terrified victims of Islamic imperialism over the centuries and the world over have done (and continue to do), some more so (e.g., the Persians, who over the centuries sold their souls and become True Believers in the Islamic Big Brother), some slightly less so (Indian Muslims, insofar as India remains massively divided along the fault-line of Muslim-Kafir), some much less so (Serbs).

“… and if one simply goes to a source that shows the pashas, military leaders and academics of the time within the area and in the Empire as a whole, many were Serbs and not converts.”

Ah, finally we see DvDH actually giving it the old college try! 😯 Unfortunately, he needs to supply evidence of this nameless “source” he promises will clear everything up for us and show us how benevolent the Muslim Turks were. And secondly, his remark demonstrates a one-dimensional grasp of what dhimmitude entailed — both on the side of the Conquerors institutionally and sociopolitically, and on the side of the Conquered, psychologically and physically. With the former, it was a way to exploit the superior ways of the resident population which the Muslims conquered (whether they be Middle Eastern, Maghrebian and Iberian Christians & Jews, or whether they be Persians, or whether they be Hindus; etc.) — for Muslims (at least some of their rulers and administrators) had a dim sense of the fact that Muslims cannot sustain a society and therefore cannot massacre simply all of the Infidels they need to continue to support various facets of the extant infrastructure they have conquered and on which they perch and into whose organism they penetrate their various parasitical appendages. Muslim conquerors thus countenanced existing populations out of necessity but treated them as second-class citizens, and even in the best of times, it was far worse than what, for example, black Africans had to endure in Ante-Bellum North America — for Islam, unlike Christianity, specifically and explicitly mandates the “humiliation” of the subject populations (at least those who were not willy-nilly slaughtered as pagans but had the distinction of being “People of the Book”).

With the latter, it was as I said above basically a phenomenon of mass Stockholm Syndrome survival; for subject populations had little choice but either to comply (and live like dogs ever vulnerable to Muslim lynch mobs who could accuse any one of them of “blasphemy” against Mohammed and thus legally kill them either themselves or have the State do it), or courageously stand on their principles — and end up headless or worse.

“A question, why did you name your blog as you did and ten refer to it as Counterjihad? …what suprises me is that the battle had nothing to do with a jihad as the last (and still is) jihad was in the 11th century in response to the claim of a crusade by Pope Urban II?”

DvDH has been sojourning in various Muslim countries over the years, and has been reading about Islam for years, and in all that time he has never heard, or read, the innumerable scholars, clerics and demagogues throughout the Muslim world in our time, and for centuries past, couch this or that political-military enterprise as a “jihad”? I think DvDH needs to get his hearing, and his eyes, checked.

3 jill starr March 6, 2011 at 7:34 pm

What It’s Like to Chill Out With Whom the Rest of the World Considers As The Most Ruthless Men: Ratko Mladic, Goran Hadzic and Radovan Karadzic (+) Confessions of a Female War Crimes Investigator By Jill Louise Starr NJ USA

What It’s Like to Chill Out With Whom the Rest of the World Considers As The Most Ruthless Men: Ratko Mladic, Goran Hadzic and Radovan Karadzic (+) Confessions of a Female War Crimes Investigator

Retrospectively, it was all so simple, natural and matter of fact being on a boat restaurant in Belgrade, sitting with, laughing, drinking a two hundred bottle of wine and chatting about war and peace while Ratko Mladic held my hand. Mladic, a man considered the world’s most ruthless war criminal since Adolf Hitler, still at large and currently having a five million dollar bounty on his head for genocide by the international community. Yet there I was with my two best friends at the time, a former Serbian diplomat, his wife, and Ratko Mladic just chilling. There was no security, nothing you’d ordinarily expect in such circumstances. Referring to himself merely as, Sharko; this is the story of it all came about.

—————————————————————————————————————————————————–
Irrefutable Proof ICTY Is Corrupt Court/Irrefutable Proof the Hague Court Cannot Legitimately Prosecute Karadzic Case By Jill Starr

http://picasaweb.google.com/lpcyusa
(The Documentary Secret United Nations ICC Meeting Papers Scanned Images)

Irrefutable Proof ICTY Is Corrupt Court/Irrefutable Proof the Hague Court Cannot Legitimately Prosecute Karadzic Case

This legal technicality indicates the Hague must dismiss charges against Dr Karadzic and others awaiting trials in the Hague jail; like it or not.

Unfortunately for the Signatures Of the Rome Statute United Nations member states instituting the ICC & ICTY housed at the Hague, insofar as the, Radovan Karadzic, as with the other Hague cases awaiting trial there, I personally witnessed these United Nations member states having a substantial conversations, and, openly speaking about trading judicial appointments and verdicts for financial funding when I attended the 2001 ICC Preparatory Meetings at the UN in Manhattan making the iCTY and ICC morally incapable trying Radovan Karazdic and others.

I witnessed with my own eyes and ears when attending the 2001 Preparatory Meetings to establish an newly emergent International Criminal Court, the exact caliber of criminal corruption running so very deeply at the Hague, that it was a perfectly viable topic of legitimate conversation in those meetings I attended to debate trading verdicts AND judicial appointments, for monetary funding.

Jilly wrote:*The rep from Spain became distraught and when her country’s proposal was not taken to well by the chair of the meeting , then Spain argued in a particularly loud and noticably strongly vocal manner, “Spain (my country) strongly believes if we contribute most financial support to the Hague’s highest court, that ought to give us and other countries feeding it financially MORE direct power over its decisions.”

Instead of censoring the country representative from Spain for even bringing up this unjust, illegal and unfair judicial idea of bribery for international judicial verdicts and judicial appointments, all country representatives present in the meeting that day all treated the Spain proposition as a ”totally legitimate topic” discussed and debated it between each other for some time. I was quite shocked! The idea was “let’s discuss it.” “It’s a great topic to discuss.”

Some countries agreed with Spain’s propositions while others did not. The point here is, bribery for judicial verdicts and judicial appointments was treated as a totally legitimate topic instead of an illegitimate topic which it is in the meeting that I attended in 2001 that day to establish the ground work for a newly emergent international criminal court.

In particular., since “Spain” was so overtly unafraid in bringing up this topic of trading financial funding the ICC for influence over its future judicial appointments and verdicts in front of every other UN member state present that day at the UN, “Spain” must have already known by previous experience the topic of bribery was “socially acceptable” for conversation that day. They must have previously spoke about bribing the ICTY and ICC before in meetings; this is my take an international sociological honor student.

SPAIN’s diplomatic gesture of international justice insofar as, Serbia, in all of this is, disgusting morally! SPAIN HAS TAUGHT THE WORLD THE TRUE DEFINITION OF AN “INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT.”

I represented the state interests’ of the Former Yugoslavia, in Diplomat Darko Trifunovic’s absence in those meetings and I am proud to undertake this effort on Serbia’s behalf.

4 1389 March 6, 2011 at 8:28 pm

@Jill Starr:
Thanks for providing this additional piece of information!

It seems to me that the UN is already a sinkhole of corruption under the control of the worst types of people (don’t get me started on Kurt Waldheim) and the EU is getting to be just about as bad. NATO should have been disbanded along with the Warsaw Pact.

I don’t believe in any form of “world government” or any large associations of governments, for any purpose. They just create a huge arena for corruption, waste, and power-grabbing to take root, shielded from any accountability. The entire idea was bad from the get-go (see Psalm 2).

These huge agglomerations of government are all based on the modern liberal idea that human nature can be perfected, warfare and strife brought to an end, and trouble and hardship removed from the human condition, by creating ideal human institutions. That we cannot create ideal human institutions in the first place, and that even relatively good human institutions do not change human nature, should be clear to anybody with normal powers of observation and cognition, but somehow people keep denying the obvious. (See Why Modern Liberals Are 100% Wrong About Everything.)

Anybody who refuses to cooperate with these evil social engineering experiments inflicted in the name of “globalism” and “multiculturalism” (and these systems are indeed evil), is demonized and is targeted for extinction by the “powers that be.” Whether it’s the US and NATO and the EU targeting the Serbs, or the Obama Administration ranting on small-town and rural American “bitter clingers”, it’s all the same idea: they want to consolidate centralized power and run the world to their liking, and we aren’t having any of it!

5 CzechRebel March 7, 2011 at 4:08 pm

We heard from our friend, DvDH, again. He had nothing new or intelligent to say, so his comment will not be posted. I REALLY don’t care how “unfair” we are. We have a written policy on what comments we will post; DvDH has consistently violated that policy and 1389 let him have his say. That is right; 1389 let DvDH post contrary to our stated policy!

Well, 1389 is a Serb and I am not. It is my humble opinion that the reason that the Serbs have the problems they have is that they are far, far, far too tolerant of those who wish to do them harm.

I suggest to DvDH, if he wants us to post his comments, that he do the following:

1. Find someone fluent in English.
2. Show that person the discussion.
3. Then ONLY write new stuff.
4. Document everything that he says, with which we disagree.
5. Not put up one word about how unfair we are.

Although we write under assumed names, most of the writers on the 1389 have covered the Balkans since the 1990s. We have investigated the various crises there. When I started covering the Balkans, I just assumed that the Serbs were equally at fault as the other ethnic peoples in the struggle. I just didn’t want to fight them, as historically, they tend win wars and inflict serious damage upon those they fight. My greatest concern was that the US and its NATO allies would find a struggle in the Balkans that would make the war in Vietnam look like a picnic. My investigation changed my opinion. I went from mildly anti-Serb (but not willing to go to war against them), to neutral and, eventually, to a pro-Serb position. It took some time, but I finally saw the light.

My mind remains open. If someone wants to show me something that might alter my opinion, I am willing to consider it. However, we have had the decade of the 90’s, the 00’s and now we are in the 10’s and I have not seen anything significant that would suggest that the Serbs were at fault. I am open to documented information and/or personal testimony from actual witnesses. This type of data can be investigated and evaluated.

Hot air cannot be investigated or evaluated. Over 90% of what DvDH sends is merely hot air. I am sure that if he can find someone who actually speaks English fluently to help him, he might be able to do a better job.

Leave a Comment

{ 1 trackback }

Previous post:

Next post: